New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes read_spikes #207
Changes read_spikes #207
Conversation
@samikane next step is to add a unit test :) |
hnn_core/network.py
Outdated
raise ValueError("gid_dict must be provided if spike types " | ||
"are unspecified in the file %s" % (file,)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably causing your flake8 error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just checked the travis build, there's a couple more issues:
@samikane these should be pretty quick to fix, you can enable flake8 in the settings of your IDE (VS code?) to catch these before pushing. Also if checks are failing you can click on them and look at the traceback to see the errors.
Satisfying flake8 while making the code readable can be more art than science at times...
I edited the PR description so it references the original issue. What's the roadblock here? |
92f3244
to
63c165f
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #207 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 66.85% 66.79% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 2290 2298 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 1531 1535 +4
- Misses 759 763 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Yeah I think the naming conventions from spike to cell response has changed so I have to change that before making a pr
Samika
… On Dec 22, 2020, at 22:00, Mainak Jas ***@***.***> wrote:
@samikane <https://github.com/samikane> do you still plan to get to this?
I can take over or @rythorpe <https://github.com/rythorpe> can if you don't have time
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#207 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK25LRMQP6XHZGUHJCUDKOTSWFMMPANCNFSM4TWVSWPA>.
|
@jasmainak stay tuned for a few remaining commits following @samikane and my meeting tomorrow. |
@jasmainak update to the pull request is ready for your review. We've added a test |
Diff looks good Can you update whats_new.rst and fix the flake8. Then I'll merge |
@jasmainak should be ready to merge now |
Looks great, merged. You did it @samikane ! Congratulations 🎉 🍻 |
This should change the read_spikes function to address issue_178. I'm not sure how to drop the change I made to the testing file, so please get rid of that somehow.
closes #178