-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
store.get() without parameters doesn't work #17
Comments
Exactly, it throws this error:
A workaround here is |
@sant123 months later still a problem ... either support should be put back in or docs updated although IMO it should be supported as was. Dev has been silent. @jonschlinkert do you have time to do this? Accepting PRs? |
Why not just do ‘store.data’?
Months later, and it still doesn’t make sense.
…Sent from my iPhone
On May 1, 2019, at 12:25 PM, David Kebler ***@***.***> wrote:
@sant123 months later still a problem ...
either support should be put back in or docs updated although IMO it be supported as was.
Dev has been silent. @jonschlinkert do you have time to do this? Accepting PRs?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
I switched to the: https://www.npmjs.com/package/preferences This is really great module. Once you assign value then it saved by default and it looks like just like JS object. I believe it uses setters. |
fixed by #17 |
store.get() without parameters doesn't work in version 3.0 but works in 1.0
In documentation is example without parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: