New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
meta-robots special settings are not working for items or component/tags ? Only default setting is active #20128
Comments
It is correct that if you set index,follow that it is not in the source because this is the default behaviour so it is not needed. I set an article to no index, no follow and it was correctly set as that |
Hi, |
Hi, should I open a new thread for this problem in tag pages ? |
@Repitol are you still experiencing this issue in the latest version of J3? |
Yes, it's a bug (or not ;-) ). The main problem is that all tags view.html.php can display 0, 1 ore more tags on 1 page. The only half-baked solution I see for this issue is to check if only 1 tag is displayed on a Another solution could be to declare the setting "robots" as misleading and remove it from tag settings. |
Please test #28334 |
Steps to reproduce the issue
Hi, when you choose in Joomla settings - Robots : index,follow
the meta tag isn't displayed in source code even for articles set to no-index, no-follow.
I could see the same problem for tags set to "no-index, no-follow"
it seems the settings in Joomla configuration overrides what you set elsewhere
Expected result
article or tags settings in publishing/robots "no-index,no-follow" should be taken into account
source code should displays
Actual result
If general Joomla settings are set to robots : Index, follow
source code doesn't display meta name robots even when you change that on some contents
so these contents are indexed and followed
System information (as much as possible)
Additional comments
tested on Joomla 3.8.6 with every default templates or commercial templates
Can you reproduce the bug ?
That is a real problem for content you don't want to be indexed.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: