We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User Actions Log
plg_easyjoomlabackupcronjob
plg_system_easyjoomlabackupcronjob
Should Joomla core change something or is it a must for developers in the future to name plugins correctly?
if (count($parts) > 2) { $source = JPATH_PLUGINS . '/' . $parts[1] . '/' . $parts[2]; } else { $source = ''; }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Too many plugins on the market that are not named correctly. So, I made a pr: #22955
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Steps to reproduce the issue
https://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/extension/access-a-security/site-security/easy-joomla-backup/
User Actions Log
overviewActual result
plg_easyjoomlabackupcronjob
and notplg_system_easyjoomlabackupcronjob
$parts[2] is not definedhttps://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/blob/3.9.0/administrator/components/com_actionlogs/helpers/actionlogs.php#L116
Question now is
Should Joomla core change something or is it a must for developers in the future to name plugins correctly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: