Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[4.0] Added password strength checker and viewer #24404

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

Arpit-24
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request for Issue # .

Summary of Changes

Added javascript that checks for password strength and displays it to the user.

Pretty basic checking with special characters, lowercase and uppercase letters and numbers.

Could use a better checking process like that of dropbox's zxcvbn project.

Testing Instructions

Visit home page
Create an account
Type in some password

Expected result

Screenshot (1266)
Screenshot (1267)

Arpit-24 and others added 11 commits March 24, 2019 02:41
Hides the header and options in full screen mode to prevent overlap over the editor area in full-screen mode.

Another possible alternative is displaying both the options as well as the editor in full-screen mode but purely a user preference. Because the need for save and other options is not as important in full-screen mode.
@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

we already have a password strength checker

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2019

@Arpit-24 yes if you know how to do this better try to solve this #24259 #23283 #23261
no one is trying to do these issues

@Arpit-24
Copy link
Contributor Author

we already have a password strength checker

I just thought a visual feedback while typing the password would be a good choice, as most nowadays have it. Will try to integrate the visual feedback with the existing strength checker

@Arpit-24
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Arpit-24 yes if you know how to do this better try to solve this #24259 #23283 #23261
no one is trying to do these issues

Sure, will try to fix them ASAP

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

yes it is a good idea. that is why it already exists!!

pass

@Arpit-24
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, didn't notice this.

@Arpit-24 Arpit-24 closed this Mar 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants