Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fields - Subform > Fields - Media : Add Multiple #37847

Open
pnkr opened this issue May 21, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Fields - Subform > Fields - Media : Add Multiple #37847

pnkr opened this issue May 21, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@pnkr
Copy link

pnkr commented May 21, 2022

Steps to reproduce the issue

Adding a custom field Media type and then select it within a Subform field.
Then in an article you can add multiple media for the subform. But if you have a lot of images you must do that one by one for each image which is exausting.

Expected result

Multiple select the images you want and add them to the subform

Actual result

Now you just need to add one by one each image. This is really unproductive.

System information (as much as possible)

Joomla 4.1.3

Additional comments

@drmenzelit
Copy link
Contributor

I think the media field is not the correct one for what do you want to do, I would suggest to use the imagelist field that allows multiple select.

@pnkr
Copy link
Author

pnkr commented May 23, 2022

Imagelist is even worst. It checks a specific predefined folder and you cannot see what images you are selecting!
But even if you could that means that you should first upload images in that bucket folder and then go there and select them.

Both ways work. I am just pointing the problem from a UX point of view. Its not productive. If by some way we could let the user select the folder in imagelist field at least it would be ok

@JackKellyUK
Copy link
Contributor

I would argue this is negative for accessibility. Widgetkit has this feature and when the accessibility audit came around for a client none of the images had alt tags as expected - wasn't fun converting them all.

@pnkr
Copy link
Author

pnkr commented Jan 8, 2023

I would argue this is negative for accessibility. Widgetkit has this feature and when the accessibility audit came around for a client none of the images had alt tags as expected - wasn't fun converting them all.

Media field adds alt field with the image so it’s not an accessibility issue. If the template does not handle this well it’s a template problem.
Except if you mean the image list.yes That is horrible in all aspects

@chmst
Copy link
Contributor

chmst commented Jan 8, 2023

@JackKellyUK thanks for mentioning a11y.
But in this case, as @pnkr says, it could possible to add an alt-text to every image. So I think it is a good feature request.

@chmst chmst added a11y Accessibility UI/UX labels Jan 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants