Incompatible options with other styles

[e-kwsm]

Sometimes I play with biblatex styles—switch and compare them.
I noticed some of options are incompatible, namely a style supports them but other doesn't.

Here is the list of options and styles.

	article-title	articletitle	chaptertitle	doi	eprint	intitle	isbn	pageranges	related
chem-acs.bbx	n	y	y	y	y	n	y	y	y
chem-angew.bbx	n	y	y	y	n	n	y	y	y
chem-biochem.bbx	n	y	y	y	y	n	y	y	y
chem-rsc.bbx	n	y	y	y	n	n	y	y	y
nature.bbx	n	y	n	n	y	y	y	n	n
science.bbx	y	n	n	n	y	n	y	n	n
phys.bbx	n	y	y	n	n	n	y	y	y

Particularly, only biblatex-science provides article-type, while the other packages—biblatex-chem, biblatex-nature, and biblatex-phys—provides articletype.

Would you support articletype option?

[josephwright]

I'll tidy up a bit here: I think with biblatex-science I was aiming for what I think is the better long-term naming.

[josephwright]

Commits a05c62b, 58c81f1 and 9ad705a should bring the Science style better in to line with the standard approach. I'll leave the issue open at present, and will look to tidy up other stuff in my 'biblatex bundles' over the coming days.

[josephwright]

Hopefully this is much tidier for the set of styles now. I've not added pagerange for everything: it's never come up for the science/nature styles. Similarly, intitle is pretty specialised: I don't think it applies to any styles other than the nature one.

[e-kwsm]

Thank you!