Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Two test failures for v0.4.12 on OSX Lion #1721

Closed
telemachus opened this issue Sep 16, 2011 · 7 comments
Closed

Two test failures for v0.4.12 on OSX Lion #1721

telemachus opened this issue Sep 16, 2011 · 7 comments

Comments

@telemachus
Copy link

The http-full-response test has been failing since v0.4.10 or so, but the second failure is new. Either way, I thought a report might be useful.

(The machine is OSX Lion 10.7.1. If any other information about the environment would be useful, let me know.)

python tools/test.py --mode=release simple message
=== release test-http-full-response ===                                    
Path: simple/test-http-full-response
node.js:134
        throw e; // process.nextTick error, or 'error' event on first tick
        ^
AssertionError: 0 == 3
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (/Users/telemachus/Downloads/node-v0.4.12/test/simple/test-http-full-response.js:92:10)
    at EventEmitter.emit (events.js:81:20)
    at EventEmitter.exit (node.js:199:15)
    at /Users/telemachus/Downloads/node-v0.4.12/test/simple/test-http-full-response.js:53:15
    at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:106:7)
    at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:67:17)
    at Socket.<anonymous> (child_process.js:172:12)
    at Socket.emit (events.js:64:17)
    at Array.<anonymous> (net.js:831:12)
    at EventEmitter._tickCallback (node.js:126:26)
Command: build/default/node /Users/telemachus/Downloads/node-v0.4.12/test/simple/test-http-full-response.js
=== release test-sendfd ===                                                
Path: simple/test-sendfd
DEBUG: CHILD: node.js:134
DEBUG: CHILD:         throw e; // process.nextTick error, or 'error' event on first tick
DEBUG: CHILD:         ^
DEBUG: CHILD: Error: ENOENT, No such file or directory
DEBUG: CHILD:     at doConnect (net.js:549:5)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Socket.connect (net.js:709:5)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/telemachus/Downloads/node-v0.4.12/test/fixtures/recvfd.js:75:3)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Module._compile (module.js:411:26)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Object..js (module.js:417:10)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Module.load (module.js:343:31)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Function._load (module.js:302:12)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at Array.<anonymous> (module.js:430:10)
DEBUG: CHILD:     at EventEmitter._tickCallback (node.js:126:26)

node.js:134
        throw e; // process.nextTick error, or 'error' event on first tick
        ^
AssertionError: 0 == 1
    at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/Users/telemachus/Downloads/node-v0.4.12/test/simple/test-sendfd.js:142:10)
    at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:67:17)
    at Socket.<anonymous> (child_process.js:172:12)
    at Socket.emit (events.js:64:17)
    at Array.<anonymous> (net.js:831:12)
    at EventEmitter._tickCallback (node.js:126:26)
Command: build/default/node /Users/telemachus/Downloads/node-v0.4.12/test/simple/test-sendfd.js
[01:14|% 100|+ 219|-   2]: Done                                                
make: *** [test] Error 1
@arlolra
Copy link

arlolra commented Oct 20, 2011

I can't confirm the problem w/ sendfd but the first one, test-http-full-response, is a bug in apache bench, discussed here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/nodejs/TZU5H7MdoII/yivu0d4LMaAJ

You can probably close this.

@telemachus
Copy link
Author

@arlolra Maybe not close it until the sendfd failure is accounted for?

@arlolra
Copy link

arlolra commented Nov 4, 2011

@telemachus is that still a problem in v0.5.10?

@telemachus
Copy link
Author

@arlolra I only follow the stable branch, but I can try v0.5.10.

Oh, wow: 0.5.10 produces 54 errors:

[02:06|% 100|+ 216|-  54]: Done

Let me know if it's useful, and I'll gist the entire test output.

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

Closing. The 0.4.x branch is dead, we're working (quite successfully) on making all tests pass on all platforms.

@telemachus
Copy link
Author

@bnoordhuis Fair enough. Is it still useful to post test failures on current branches? (I still get two failures with 0.6.14 on OSX.)

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

@telemachus: Sure. But I'd prefer results for releases from the master branch (0.7.x) as that's where most of the work goes into.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants