Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix TS definitions #633

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 17, 2023
Merged

Fix TS definitions #633

merged 1 commit into from Apr 17, 2023

Conversation

dkaushik95
Copy link
Contributor

  • Converted lhs into an array of ExprNode (optional with empty array)
  • Added options as parameters for jsonata

Signed-off-by: Dishant Kaushik dkaushik95@gmail.com


Related issue: #585

- Converted lhs into an array of ExprNode (optional with empty array)
@mattbaileyuk
Copy link
Member

Thanks for fixing this! 👍

@mattbaileyuk mattbaileyuk merged commit b04a0ee into jsonata-js:master Apr 17, 2023
6 checks passed
nddery added a commit to Stedi/jsonata that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
An update to the TS definition in
jsonata-js#633 is causing issues in
transformers-jsonata since we are using both 1.x and 2.x versions in
there and types do not align anymore. Reverting the change for now. We
overwrite the type of the NodeExpr in mappings anyway, and so this
should be fine for now.
nddery added a commit to Stedi/jsonata that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
is causing issues in transformers-jsonata since we are using both 1.x and 2.x
versions in there and types do not align anymore. Reverting the change for now.
We overwrite the type of the NodeExpr in mappings anyway, and so this should be
fine for now.
nddery added a commit to Stedi/jsonata that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
An update to the TS definition in jsonata-js#633
is causing issues in transformers-jsonata since we are using both 1.x and 2.x
versions in there and types do not align anymore. Reverting the change for now.
We overwrite the type of the NodeExpr in mappings anyway, and so this should be
fine for now.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants