Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add JobList Component, Refactor Jobs, Adjust API Logic and Styling #123

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

thomasdavis
Copy link
Member

@thomasdavis thomasdavis commented Jul 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced JobList component to render detailed job cards with a cover letter generation option.
  • Refactor

    • Improved code organization in the Jobs page by extracting job rendering logic into the new JobList component.
  • Style

    • Adjusted the width of images in the Explore page for a more streamlined appearance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced job sorting and filtering logic to better reflect similarity scores and creation dates.
    • Updated resume fetching logic to order results by creation date in descending order.
  • Chores

    • Implemented additional error logging and improved data fetching logic in scripts for better reliability.
  • Revert

    • Updated constants and API endpoints in job fetching scripts for accurate data retrieval.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 3, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
jsonresume-org-homepage2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 5, 2024 7:13am
jsonresume-org-registry ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 5, 2024 7:13am

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 3, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8accd1c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the project enhance various components and scripts related to job management and presentation. Notably, a new JobList React component improves job listings' user interface, while backend modifications refine sorting and filtering logic for job APIs. Other updates include styling adjustments, improved data fetching protocols, and new configurations in automation scripts.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/JobList.js Introduced a new JobList component to render detailed job cards.
apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/page.js Refactored Jobs component to utilize JobList for better code organization and maintainability.
apps/registry/app/explore/page.js Adjusted width of an Image component from 200px to 90px.
apps/registry/pages/api/jobs.js Updated sorting/filtering logic for job documents and IDs, and adjusted match criteria and thresholds.
apps/registry/pages/api/resumes.js Changed functionality to order results by created_at without a limit query parameter.
apps/registry/scripts/jobs/gpted.js Enhanced data fetching with additional filtering and logging; reduced timeout duration.
apps/registry/scripts/jobs/hackernews.js Updated the WHO_IS_HIRING_ITEM_ID constant affecting the API endpoint.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    participant User
    participant JobsPage
    participant JobList
    participant API

    User->>+JobsPage: Navigate to Jobs Page
    JobsPage->>+JobList: Load Job Listings
    JobList->>+API: Fetch Jobs Data
    API-->>-JobList: Return Jobs Data
    JobList-->>-JobsPage: Render Job Listings
    JobsPage-->>-User: Display Job Listings

    Note over User, JobsPage: New Data Grabbing and Rendering Flow
Loading

Poem

In code, we march, a daring quest,

From jobs to scripts, we give our best,

With lists and filters, data flow,

A smoother ride where users go.

The bits and bytes, they click and hum,

A clever rabbit's work is never done.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

alwaysmeticulous bot commented Jul 3, 2024

✅ Meticulous spotted zero visual differences across 57 screens tested: view results.

Expected differences? Click here. Last updated for commit 8accd1c. This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/page.js (1)

75-75: Typo in documentation comment.

There is a typo in the documentation comment. "GPT 4o" should be "GPT-4".

-        is done for Hacker News posts which have also been processed by GPT 4o.
+        is done for Hacker News posts which have also been processed by GPT-4.
apps/registry/scripts/jobs/gpted.js (1)

263-264: Typo in documentation comment.

There is a typo in the documentation comment. "succint" should be "succinct".

-        Make sure things are too long. Be short and succint.
+        Make sure things are too long. Be short and succinct.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 701987d and 19883c1.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/JobList.js (1 hunks)
  • apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/page.js (3 hunks)
  • apps/registry/app/explore/page.js (1 hunks)
  • apps/registry/pages/api/jobs.js (1 hunks)
  • apps/registry/pages/api/resumes.js (1 hunks)
  • apps/registry/scripts/jobs/gpted.js (3 hunks)
  • apps/registry/scripts/jobs/hackernews.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • apps/registry/app/explore/page.js
  • apps/registry/scripts/jobs/hackernews.js
Additional comments not posted (25)
apps/registry/pages/api/resumes.js (1)

14-14: LGTM! Ensure proper indexing on the created_at column.

The addition of the .order('created_at', { ascending: false }) clause is correct. Ensure the created_at column in the resumes table is indexed for optimal query performance.

apps/registry/pages/api/jobs.js (4)

50-51: Adjustments to match_threshold and match_count look good.

Ensure these values are optimal for your dataset and use case.


57-57: Ensure documents are sorted before mapping job IDs.

Sorting documents by similarity before mapping job IDs is correct. Ensure this logic is thoroughly tested.


61-62: Ensure jobs are sorted in the same order as job IDs.

Sorting jobs in the same order as job IDs is correct. Ensure this logic is thoroughly tested.


64-66: Ensure correct date filtering logic.

The date filtering logic looks good. Ensure the date comparison criterion is correct and tested.

apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/page.js (2)

6-9: Importing JobList component looks good.

The import statements are correct and improve code organization.


85-85: Using JobList component looks good.

The usage of the JobList component is correct and improves code organization.

apps/registry/app/[username]/jobs/JobList.js (16)

9-13: Styled-components for JobListContainer look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobListContainer is correct and follows best practices.


15-20: Styled-components for JobCard look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobCard is correct and follows best practices.


22-26: Styled-components for JobTitle look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobTitle is correct and follows best practices.


28-32: Styled-components for JobCompany look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobCompany is correct and follows best practices.


34-41: Styled-components for JobType look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobType is correct and follows best practices.


43-47: Styled-components for JobDate look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobDate is correct and follows best practices.


49-52: Styled-components for JobDescription look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobDescription is correct and follows best practices.


54-57: Styled-components for JobLocation look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobLocation is correct and follows best practices.


59-62: Styled-components for JobRemote look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobRemote is correct and follows best practices.


64-67: Styled-components for JobSalary look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobSalary is correct and follows best practices.


69-72: Styled-components for JobExperience look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobExperience is correct and follows best practices.


74-77: Styled-components for JobResponsibilities look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobResponsibilities is correct and follows best practices.


79-82: Styled-components for JobQualifications look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobQualifications is correct and follows best practices.


84-87: Styled-components for JobSkills look good.

The styled-components implementation for JobSkills is correct and follows best practices.


89-93: Parsing job.gpt_content correctly.

The code correctly parses job.gpt_content to create fullJobs.


97-155: Rendering job details correctly.

The code correctly renders job details using the JobListContainer and JobCard components.

apps/registry/scripts/jobs/gpted.js (2)

221-224: Excluding records where gpt_content is null looks good.

The query correctly excludes records where gpt_content is null.


362-362: Reducing timeout for Promise resolution looks good.

The timeout for Promise resolution has been reduced from 5000ms to 1000ms. Ensure this value is optimal for your use case.

});

const jobIds = documents ? documents.map((doc) => doc.id) : [];
console.log({ documents });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove console.log statements in production code.

The console.log statement should be removed or replaced with proper logging for production.

-  console.log({ documents });
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
console.log({ documents });

@@ -89,12 +65,14 @@ export default function Jobs({ params }) {
setSubmitting(true);
};

console.log({ jobs });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove console.log statements in production code.

The console.log statement should be removed or replaced with proper logging for production.

-  console.log({ jobs });
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
console.log({ jobs });

Comment on lines +1 to +2
// Install styled-components if you haven't already
// npm install styled-components
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove installation comments in production code.

The installation comments should be removed from the production code.

-// Install styled-components if you haven't already
-// npm install styled-components
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// Install styled-components if you haven't already
// npm install styled-components

return fullJob;
});

console.log({ fullJobs });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove console.log statements in production code.

The console.log statement should be removed or replaced with proper logging for production.

-  console.log({ fullJobs });
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
console.log({ fullJobs });

.from('jobs')
.select()
.not('gpt_content', 'is', null);
console.log('fetched', data, error);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove excessive console.log statements in production code.

The excessive console.log statements should be removed or replaced with proper logging for production.

-  console.log('AFASDASDAS');
-  console.log('AFASDASDAS');
-  console.log('AFASDASDAS');
-  console.log('AFASDASDAS');
-  console.log('AFASDASDAS');
-  console.log('AFASDASDAS');

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant