New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Features comparison table vs angular-i18n, ngx-translate, angular-l10n, ... #13
Comments
Did you check out this section of the README file? |
Can you add something like translation file support to the table? Would be good to know if it supports Also translation of plurals should be added for comparison. And what about a comparison against the build in translation tool (+ the i18n Polyfill for components)? I think what @dsuwirya meant was adding those other tools/packages to the table. |
@DanielHabenicht |
We have added Pluralization to the table but decided that it's the last thing we'll add to it. |
@shaharkazaz The link is outdated. Is there a comparison in the new docs website, too? I wonder what are the benifits of transloco over ngx-translate |
@MickL I found the most recent version of the comparison chart before they redid the docs here: https://web.archive.org/web/20191004014440/https://github.com/ngneat/transloco/ |
Is it possible to add the current comparison table again somewhere? |
@rala72 We decided to remove the comparison (due to several reasons). I'm sure that quick research will provide you with all the information needed. |
Hello,
Would be really great if you can add features comparison table like what the angular-l10n has, that will ease developers to make decision which library is best to use depending on their situations.
ref. https://github.com/robisim74/angular-l10n
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: