Move test case to new location

tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase0/epoch_processing/test_process_registry_updates.py

@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-import pytest
-
 from eth2spec.test.helpers.deposits import mock_deposit
 from eth2spec.test.helpers.state import next_epoch, next_slots
 from eth2spec.test.helpers.constants import MINIMAL
@@ -344,27 +342,3 @@ def test_activation_queue_activation_and_ejection__exceed_scaled_churn_limit(spe
     churn_limit = spec.get_validator_churn_limit(state)
     assert churn_limit > spec.config.MIN_PER_EPOCH_CHURN_LIMIT
     yield from run_test_activation_queue_activation_and_ejection(spec, state, churn_limit * 2)
-
-
-@with_all_phases
-@spec_state_test
-def test_invalid_large_withdrawable_epoch(spec, state):
-    """
-    This test forces a validator into a withdrawable epoch that overflows the
-    epoch (uint64) type. To do this we need two validators, one validator that
-    already has an exit epoch and another with a low effective balance. When
-    calculating the withdrawable epoch for the second validator, it will
-    use the greatest exit epoch of all of the validators. If the first
-    validator is given an exit epoch between
-    (FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH-MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWABILITY_DELAY+1) and
-    (FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH-1), it will cause an overflow.
-    """
-    assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[0], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
-    assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[1], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
-
-    state.validators[0].exit_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH - 1
-    state.validators[1].effective_balance = spec.config.EJECTION_BALANCE
-
-    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
-        yield from run_process_registry_updates(spec, state)
-    yield 'post', None

tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/phase0/helper_functions/test_misc.py

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+import pytest
+
+from eth2spec.test.context import spec_state_test, with_all_phases
+
+@with_all_phases
+@spec_state_test
+def test_invalid_large_withdrawable_epoch(spec, state):
+    """
+    This test forces a validator into a withdrawable epoch that overflows the
+    epoch (uint64) type. To do this we need two validators, one validator that
+    already has an exit epoch and another with a low effective balance. When
+    calculating the withdrawable epoch for the second validator, it will
+    use the greatest exit epoch of all of the validators. If the first
+    validator is given an exit epoch between
+    (FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH-MIN_VALIDATOR_WITHDRAWABILITY_DELAY+1) and
+    (FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH-1), it will cause an overflow.
+    """
+    assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[0], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
+    assert spec.is_active_validator(state.validators[1], spec.get_current_epoch(state))
+
+    state.validators[0].exit_epoch = spec.FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH - 1
+    state.validators[1].effective_balance = spec.config.EJECTION_BALANCE
+
+    yield 'pre', state
+    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
+        spec.initiate_validator_exit(state, 1)
+    yield 'post', None