Update config.guess.
#689
Merged
Update config.guess.
#689
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Really grateful for #688, but there's one problem: it's a lot of work to review that entire script! There's some clear improvements, but also a lot of more or less arbitrary changes. Yes, yes, I know — the script comes from the GNU site, which we trust all the time anyway. But how do I _know_ that it came from the GNU site? So here's a lazy shortcut: I download an update of known GNU provenance, I merge that into the repo, and then hopefully the PR will resolve to a tiny remaining diff. Or if we're lucky, none at all.
olawlor
added a commit
to AuroraRoboticsLab/libpqxx
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Update `config.guess`. (jtv#689)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Really grateful for #688, but there's one problem: it's a lot of work to review that entire script! There's some clear improvements, but also a lot of more or less arbitrary changes.
Yes, yes, I know — the script comes from the GNU site, which we trust all the time anyway. But how do I know that it came from the GNU site?
So here's a lazy shortcut: I download an update of known GNU provenance, I merge that into the repo, and then hopefully the PR will resolve to a tiny remaining diff. Or if we're lucky, none at all.