Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PDF-X(3) #9

Open
tpapp opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 9 comments
Open

PDF-X(3) #9

tpapp opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@tpapp
Copy link

tpapp commented May 28, 2020

I am printing a new batch of logos, and while the printer is OK with RGB in SVG, I was told that I would get the most color fidelity in PDF/X (preferably PDF/X-3) using CYMK.

I wonder if we can generate such a file for the logo, either as an asset for this repo or in a release tarball. The intricaties of color management are outside my area of expertise, but if there are tools in Linux to do this I am happy to make a Docker image that automates this.

@cormullion
Copy link
Collaborator

I can add a PDFX3 CYMK version. A quick comparison on screen suggests that the blue is (as usual) the main victim of the CYMK conversion:

Screenshot 2020-05-28 at 10 42 08

@tpapp
Copy link
Author

tpapp commented May 28, 2020

Sure, but I would rather have us convert the blue in a standardized way than leaving it to the printer.

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Jan 6, 2023

Hi everyone, +1ing this.

Just specifying the actual colorspace for the RGB colors (is it adobe RGB?) would help a lot already. Additionally, the usual CMYK conversion tools suck, so having a method in place to convert it with given colorimetric intent in mind would be super helpful. (E.g., how do I print the nice julia blue on coated paper?)

Also, I'm not a big fan of pantone, but naming the pantone spot colors for the printing would be probably the easiest to do this reliably now.

@cormullion
Copy link
Collaborator

Personally, I avoid this stuff as much as possible, and try to avoid using proprietary software like Adobe and Pantone anyway. Last time I got something printed on paper I got the printer guy to do the matching/conversion for me; the professionals know their stuff and don't get paid if they get it wrong... :)

I'm more than happy for anyone experienced in this area to develop precise color specifications, and I wish them good fortune!

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Jan 6, 2023

Yeah, certainly not trying to go help adobe in any way, but esp. for communicating precisely with printers this may help a lot.

Anyway, I assume the current colors are sRGB?

@cormullion
Copy link
Collaborator

🤷

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Jan 6, 2023

Anyway, for anyone searching for CMYK values, these are extracted from the pdfx3 version and print much better than srgb:

red: 0.0392151 0.875 0.832031 0.0627441
blue 0.765625 0.533203 0 0
violet 0.498047 0.662109 0 0
green 0.673828 0.0392151 0.984375 0.121582

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Anyone want to make a PR to add more printer helpful versions to the repo? I think the stance "for communicating precisely with printers this may help a lot" is the right one. We don't dictate what printing technology people may have to use, we just have to work with it and try to make the best of it.

@exaexa
Copy link

exaexa commented Jan 6, 2023

To be future-safe I think one pretty good way would be to agree on CIELAB or CIEXYZ colorspace values, and point people to tools like icclu (see http://www.argyllcms.com/ ) that can translate these colorspaces to pretty much any sensible color system out there.

EDIT: liblcms2-utils seems also pretty useful, like transicc. ( https://www.littlecms.com/tags/lcms2/ )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants