Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Boost response time of webhook #96

Open
jravenel opened this issue May 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Boost response time of webhook #96

jravenel opened this issue May 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jravenel @Dr0p42 @FlorentLvr
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
Credit API alpha

Comments

@jravenel
Copy link

jravenel commented May 30, 2021 •
edited

When we call webhook we should find a way to make kernel boot faster

https://naas.canny.io/requests/p/boost-response-time-of-webhook
@jravenel jravenel created this issue from a note in Community Roadmap (Backlog) May 30, 2021
@jravenel jravenel added the enhancement New feature or request label May 30, 2021
@FlorentLvr FlorentLvr added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 4, 2021
@FlorentLvr
Copy link
Contributor

FlorentLvr commented Jun 4, 2021 •
edited

When the request is too long, we can be disconnected =>
('Connection aborted.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote end closed connection without response'))

@jravenel jravenel removed this from Backlog in Community Roadmap Feb 20, 2022
@jravenel jravenel removed the bug Something isn't working label Feb 22, 2022
@jravenel jravenel added this to the Better user experience milestone Mar 20, 2022
@jravenel
Copy link
Author

jravenel commented Mar 21, 2022 •
edited

We need to convert the notebook into a python script to decrease execution time. Cf our meeting @Dr0p42

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jravenel jravenel

@Dr0p42 Dr0p42

@FlorentLvr FlorentLvr

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Credit API alpha
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jravenel @Dr0p42 @FlorentLvr