Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design to replace vertical tabs on widgets page #156

Closed
SylvainCorlay opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Design to replace vertical tabs on widgets page #156

SylvainCorlay opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@SylvainCorlay
Copy link
Member

We are going to have a couple of new examples in the widgets gallery soon

  • the matplotlib widget (jupyter-matplolib)
  • nglview
  • probably the molecular design toolkit.

The current vertical tabs are not great from the user experience's perspective.

Besides, for the widgets to benefit from the resize events, we should probably use a phosphor panel instead of pure css layout.

cc @jasongrout

@SylvainCorlay
Copy link
Member Author

@ellisonbg @cameronoelsen

Since it will become a requirement for us to start using a phosphor widget in place of the current tabs for the widgets gallery, it could be really interesting work on design ideas for such a gallery.

Besides bqplot, pythreejs, ipyleaflet, we will also probably have items with nglview and the autodesk molecular design toolkit, and then ipympl when matplotlib 2.0 is released. I was thinking of a form of carousel with a small image for each library and then a classical document layout for each widget.

@cameronoelsen
Copy link
Contributor

@SylvainCorlay Where do we stand with this? I can help out on this page if we wanted to start iterating!

@palewire
Copy link
Collaborator

Since this ticket has been inactive for four years, I'm going to close as stale. If you'd like to continue the discussion, feel free to chime in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants