Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add el & update css in output_area to match run button in input prompt from #3535 #3687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2018

Conversation

mpacer
Copy link
Member

@mpacer mpacer commented Jun 14, 2018

Without this change the output and Input areas become unaligned.

This still isn't an ideal fix, but it'll make a release possible without making the styling problematic.

This can be seen as a styling continuation of #3535.

…yter#3535

Without this change the output and Input areas become unaligned.

This still isn't an ideal fix, but it'll make a release possible without
making the styling problematic.
@mpacer mpacer added this to the 5.6 milestone Jun 14, 2018
@mpacer
Copy link
Member Author

mpacer commented Jun 14, 2018

@takluyver @minrk @gnestor I don't think this is super controversial (in comparison to 3535), can I get an expedited review so that I can proceed with making a release candidate for 5.6?

@mpacer
Copy link
Member Author

mpacer commented Jun 14, 2018

Alternatively to a expedited review, if we do want to iterate on this PR a bunch, I'd like to suggest reverting #3535 to make a 5.6 release candidate possible, pushing it until 5.7 (or 5.6.1) when we can figure out a better way to handle the styling issues.

@rgbkrk rgbkrk merged commit c852813 into jupyter:master Jun 14, 2018
@gnestor
Copy link
Contributor

gnestor commented Jun 14, 2018

Thanks @mpacer! Let me know how I can help with 5.6 efforts 👍

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 1, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants