Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore detection of missing terminado package #5465
Restore detection of missing terminado package #5465
Changes from 3 commits
030e879
a06c79b
77aa2d9
1841897
4b36b47
2c5ccb2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Modifying this still seems like it's inviting confusion, because what
.terminals_enabled
means depends on the point at which you use it: before this, it means a config option, and after this it means whether the terminal machinery is used.Can I suggest that we keep clearly separate terms for the three things we might want to know, e.g.
terminals_available
,terminals_enabled
andterminals_in_use
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, although I believe
terminado_available
as an indication of the package's presence is more clear thanterminals_available
if that's okay.I also think it's important to issue the warning message when terminals are enabled but the terminado is not present even though we know that answer prior to
init_terminals
. I've retained that try-catch in case there might be other initialization failures down the road.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem - I wasn't tied to those specific names, just keen to distinguish the concepts.
Now
terminals_available
on the webapp is the equivalent ofterminals_in_use
on the Jupyter app class. It's possibly worth aligning those, but I don't think it's a big deal either.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't look quite right. This method is to shut down the server after a certain time with no kernels/terminals. Terminals not in use means no terminals running, but this early return prevents it from ever shutting down.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😄 Looks like we could do with another pass at naming, as you alluded to in another comment. I was coming to same conclusion about
terminals_in_use
yesterday (while doing yard work). I think a switch (alignment) toterminals_available
might just be the best name:a.
terminado_available
= Terminado package is installedb.
terminals_enabled
= User has condoned the use of terminals (independent of terminado's presence)c.
terminals_available
= User has condoned the use of terminals and terminado is installedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be clear, I think there's an actual logic bug here, regardless of which name we're using. ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're absolutely correct. Thank you for spotting that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I think this is in good shape now. :-)