TST: don't assume test user is OS user #301
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mock getpwnam to always return result for current user since test user may well no exist In particular, JupyterHub 5 test utilities no longer create a test user with the running user's name
|
Merging since this is small and gets tests passing again |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
mock getpwnam to always return result for current user
since test user may well not exist on the system
In particular, JupyterHub 5 test utilities no longer create a test user with the running user's name, which is causing tests to fail, since so far batchspawner tests have assumed that the first user in the database matches
getpass.getuser().