Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MRG] Generate coverage while running tests #820

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2019

Conversation

betatim
Copy link
Member

@betatim betatim commented Apr 8, 2019

I found this inconsistency between how we run our tests while investigating why codecov doesn't show me which lines have coverage and which don't.

I was expecting https://codecov.io/gh/jupyterhub/binderhub/src/master/binderhub/build.py to show me which lines are covered. We seem to be computing some kind of coverage number because for the whole file it knows, but for some reason it doesn't show which lines are missing. If you look at code from (say) repo2docker https://codecov.io/gh/jupyter/repo2docker/src/master/repo2docker/app.py you see the green blobs in front of lines that are covered as well as background shading.

@betatim betatim changed the title [WIP] Generate coverage while running tests [MRG] Generate coverage while running tests Apr 9, 2019
@betatim
Copy link
Member Author

betatim commented Apr 9, 2019

At least inn the codecov pages linked from this PR it seems like we get the big green dots in front of each line back.

@betatim betatim merged commit a1a520d into jupyterhub:master Apr 11, 2019
@betatim betatim deleted the coverage-reporting branch April 11, 2019 18:24
yuvipanda pushed a commit to jupyterhub/helm-chart that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2019
@choldgraf choldgraf added the maintenance Under the hood improvements and fixes label Oct 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Under the hood improvements and fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants