Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new methods from node 0.12.7 #571

Closed
karaxuna opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Add new methods from node 0.12.7 #571

karaxuna opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@karaxuna
Copy link
Member

Compared node 0.12.x and jxcore apis. See compare results.
See also useful post about changes after node v0,10.

Features already added:

util.debuglog for conditional debugging.
Writable.cork method that forces buffering of all writes. See docs.
Writable.setDefaultEncoding method. See docs
path.isAbsolute method. See docs
lookup event when calling socket.connect (triggers after dns.lookup). See docs
reset event to repl. Triggers when calling .clear from repl client. See docs
Writable._writev method. See docs

@brodybits
Copy link
Member

See #535 (comment): The plan is to skip Node 0.12.7 and (eventually) target Node 4.0 (which is already released).

@obastemur
Copy link
Member

@brodybits this work is for upcoming 0.3.x. I'm almost finished with Chakra (v8 3.28+) support. We will be adding missing API (comparing to 0.12) to 0.3.x series until 0.4.x is ready.

@obastemur
Copy link
Member

better merge new API into 0.3.1.x (since we are updating the API) IMHO, It's important not to add anything breaking node 0.10.x compatibility.

@brodybits
Copy link
Member

👍

@brodybits
Copy link
Member

Also adding a reference to #402 where Node 0.12.x was discussed before. Nice to include whatever we can from 0.12.

@obastemur
Copy link
Member

@karaxuna can you mark the ones (on comparison list) already part of 0.3.1.0 ?

@ktrzeciaknubisa
Copy link
Member

Implemented with #582 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants