Document process for moving collections from Incubator to Stable. #183
Comments
@stephenkinder I think we are getting to a point where it would be fair to consider the ICP4A, Kabanero and Appsody versions of a stack separate entities. What are your thoughts on this? |
@stephenkinder The collections are today stored in github under separate repository directories, ie If we (Kabanero) or Champ are going to be moving collections to a different stage without the upstream stacks being moved, then having Champ have a fork of Kabanero collections and that as a fork of Appsody is a bit of a waste of time. As soon as Champ or we move a stack/collection the entire use of the fork / merge process becomes a real nightmare and redundant. We need to make a decision on whether we stick with forking Appsody or not? @kilnerm and I have also been thinking that having the stacks/collection in different stage directories makes this process a bit cumbersome. We have been thinking of having a flat structure and having the stage ie The above suggestion would need changes to quite a few other components, Kabanero build process, Appsody CLI, Kabanero Operator, ..... We will also discuss this with the Appsody team to see what they think about the idea. @kilnerm is going to be writing up our proposal and will pass this around for comments etc when done. |
@stephenkinder @kilnerm
Once this is done and a new version of the collection is available then Jane will be able to use that new collection. |
Need agreement on the architecture descions before implementation. |
According to Neeraj, Appsody will be creating a draft from Appsody point of view.. but it won't be ready this week. They hope to have it in next sprint (2 weeks today). |
Moving it to 0.6.0 since the feature in AHA was moved to release 0.6.0 |
@marikaj123 As the concept of Kabanero collection hub will be going away in 0.6.0 in lieu of Appsody stack hub, the process for moving collections from incubator to stable etc is now becoming an Appsody process that needs to be defined and not a Kabanero Collections process. As such I think this issue should be closed or moved to the Appsody issues board and tracked there. |
@groeges - Can you please add the link to the Appsody issue that would replace this issue for collection and then close the Epic. Thank you. |
Appsody project has published a first draft of:
The team will look go evolve it further as we do more work in this area. |
@stephenkinder - Hi Steve, Is there any more work required before we can close the Epic from Kabanero perspective? |
According to Steve it can close |
At the moment, the Kabanero Collections are all in incubator status. We need to document the process which collections are graduated to stable, and how does that affect the Kabanero operator by default?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: