Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TaskSequencer efficiency #1860

Open
danpovey opened this issue Aug 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

TaskSequencer efficiency #1860

danpovey opened this issue Aug 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@kkm000
Labels
Priority: lower It will take us a while to get to this, be patient stale-exclude Stale bot ignore this issue

Comments

@danpovey
Copy link
Contributor

Template class TaskSequencer is not very efficient as it doesn't re-use threads. If it were possible to make it re-use threads (effectively using a thread pool) without adding a huge amount of complexity it would be great. But this isn't urgent, as I think thread creation/destruction doesn't dominate in any of the current applications of the class. @dogancan, I know you are familiar with multi-threaded programmming.
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 19, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Stale bot on the loose label Jun 19, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 19, 2020

This issue has been automatically closed by a bot strictly because of inactivity. This does not mean that we think that this issue is not important! If you believe it has been closed hastily, add a comment to the issue and mention @kkm000, and I'll gladly reopen it.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 19, 2020
@kkm000 kkm000 self-assigned this Jul 19, 2020
@kkm000 kkm000 added Priority: lower It will take us a while to get to this, be patient stale-exclude Stale bot ignore this issue and removed stale Stale bot on the loose labels Jul 19, 2020
@kkm000 kkm000 reopened this Jul 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kkm000 kkm000

Labels
Priority: lower It will take us a while to get to this, be patient stale-exclude Stale bot ignore this issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@danpovey @kkm000