Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tm: add relay_100 config parameter to support stateless operation #1534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2018

Conversation

armenb
Copy link
Contributor

@armenb armenb commented May 16, 2018

Pre-Submission Checklist

  • Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
  • Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
  • Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
  • No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
    in doc/ subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)

Type Of Change

  • Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

Checklist:

  • PR should be backported to stable branches
  • Tested changes locally
  • Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)

Description

@kamailio-sync
Copy link

kamailio-sync commented May 16, 2018 via email

@@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ static enum rps t_should_relay_response( struct cell *Trans , int new_code,
#endif
/* 1xx and 2xx except 100 will be relayed */
Trans->uac[branch].last_received=new_code;
*should_relay= new_code==100? -1 : branch;
*should_relay= (new_code=100 && !cfg_get(tm, tm_cfg, relay_100)) ? -1 : branch;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it still be new_code==100 in the condition or I am missing something?

@armenb
Copy link
Contributor Author

armenb commented Jun 22, 2018

The last sentence of RFC3261 Section 21.1.1 implicitly suggests that it is valid behavior to forward 100 Trying when operating stateless mode, which is which this change aims to allow.

I've also updated documentation.

@miconda miconda merged commit 8a12e15 into kamailio:master Jun 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants