Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: RFC OpenSSL 3 fixes #3696

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

WIP: RFC OpenSSL 3 fixes #3696

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

space88man
Copy link
Contributor

Pre-Submission Checklist

  • Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
  • [X ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
  • Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
  • No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
    in doc/ subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)

Type Of Change

  • Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

Checklist:

Description

  • changes to avoid setting ERR_STATE * in rank 0 main thread - all config is done in a transient worker thread
  • tls_fix_domains_cfg() is performed in PROC_SIPINIT instead of PROC_INIT (could also be done in worker thread)
  • changes to a module outbound.so: OpenSSL config is done in a transient worker thread

- avoid initializing ERR_STATE in the main thread of rank 0
- run configuration functions in a separate thread so that the
  main thread is not contaminated
- call OpenSSL 3 functions in a thread to avoid contaminating
  the main thread of rank 0
@space88man space88man marked this pull request as draft January 3, 2024 21:45
@space88man space88man self-assigned this Jan 3, 2024
@space88man space88man closed this Jan 4, 2024
@space88man space88man deleted the space88man/openssl3-poc branch January 12, 2024 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant