Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tm: add mandatory Max-Forwards header to local ACK #3856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

juha-h
Copy link
Contributor

@juha-h juha-h commented May 20, 2024

Type Of Change

  • [ x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

Checklist:

  • [x ] PR should be backported to stable branches
  • [ x] Tested changes locally
  • Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)

Description

Add mandatory Max-Forwards header to local ACK

@miconda
Copy link
Member

miconda commented May 20, 2024

Remember that the git commit message first line has to be formatted as per contributing guidelines, it has to be prefixed with the component name:

The commit messages are used for generating the changelog for releases as well as making easier to figure out what was impacted by a commit. Having the commit message in the proper format makes it easier to merge as well directly from the git PR portal.

@juha-h
Copy link
Contributor Author

juha-h commented May 20, 2024

Same checks bug as earlier: according to Details, check-format PASSED, but there still claim that Some checks were not successful.

@juha-h juha-h changed the title Add mandatory Max-Forwards header to local ACK tm: add mandatory Max-Forwards header to local ACK May 20, 2024
@linuxmaniac
Copy link
Member

@juha-h is not a bug. The format checks each commit. I already told you how to properly do it.

Just create one commit with the proper commit message prefix squashing both previous commits in the branch.

@juha-h
Copy link
Contributor Author

juha-h commented May 20, 2024 via email

@juha-h
Copy link
Contributor Author

juha-h commented May 20, 2024 via email

@linuxmaniac
Copy link
Member

since it's a branch in kamailio repo I did it myself.

git rebase -i origin/master

squashed both commits and added the tm prefix

@linuxmaniac
Copy link
Member

The idea behind it's that all commits are properly formatted.

@linuxmaniac linuxmaniac merged commit d4629be into master May 20, 2024
4 checks passed
@linuxmaniac linuxmaniac deleted the max_forwards branch May 20, 2024 10:18
@juha-h
Copy link
Contributor Author

juha-h commented May 20, 2024

Is it OK to cherry-pick this to 5.8 branch?

@miconda
Copy link
Member

miconda commented May 20, 2024

Yes, it can be cherry-picked, it is about a mandatory header.

@juha-h
Copy link
Contributor Author

juha-h commented May 20, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants