Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

test:cri: Should test guest AppArmor support #5748

Open
ManaSugi opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #5749
Open

test:cri: Should test guest AppArmor support #5748

ManaSugi opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #5749
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature needs-review Needs to be assessed by the team.

Comments

@ManaSugi
Copy link
Member

AppArmor support on the guest side will be added to the Kata containers by kata-containers/kata-containers#7587, so let's test the feature in our CI.

@ManaSugi ManaSugi added enhancement Improvement to an existing feature needs-review Needs to be assessed by the team. labels Aug 18, 2023
@ManaSugi ManaSugi linked a pull request Aug 18, 2023 that will close this issue
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
ManaSugi added a commit to ManaSugi/tests that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
Add a test case which check whether AppArmor inside the guest
works properly using containerd.

The test creates a container configured to apply the `kata-default`
profile, then it checks the container process is running with the
profile enforced.

Fixes: kata-containers#5748
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers#7587

Signed-off-by: Manabu Sugimoto <Manabu.Sugimoto@sony.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature needs-review Needs to be assessed by the team.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant