Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate MX and DB storage persistence #112

Closed
katefike opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Evaluate MX and DB storage persistence #112

katefike opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@katefike
Copy link
Owner

katefike commented Nov 16, 2023

DONE WHEN

  • Done when we know what work is necessary to redundantly backup storage for the MX and DB.
  • Another important aspects of backups is knowing that you can actually utilize them and recreate prod in a pickle. Storage persistence goes hand-in-hand with CD and B/G Deployments.

WORK NEEDED

@katefike katefike added bug Something isn't working prod labels Nov 16, 2023
@katefike katefike self-assigned this Nov 16, 2023
@katefike katefike added this to the Production Deployment milestone Feb 27, 2024
@katefike katefike changed the title Receive an email on the containerized production MX unused Mar 1, 2024
@katefike katefike removed their assignment Mar 1, 2024
@katefike katefike added infrastructure and removed bug Something isn't working labels Mar 1, 2024
@katefike katefike changed the title unused Evaluate MX and DB storage persistence Mar 1, 2024
@katefike katefike self-assigned this Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

1 participant