-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add: inVertex and outVertex label in edge table #104
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates revolve around enhancing a script to generate SQL from graph data structures. It now dynamically constructs SQL tables and insert statements, reflecting the graph's vertices and edges. The changes improve the script's adaptability to various graph configurations by incorporating vertex labels and IDs directly into the SQL schema and data manipulation processes. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #104 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.83% 72.00% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 348 350 +2
Branches 37 43 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 250 252 +2
Misses 98 98 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/main/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdge.scala (3 hunks)
- src/test/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdgeSpec.scala (3 hunks)
- src/test/scala/usecase/ByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala (5 hunks)
- src/test/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 14
src/main/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdge.scala (3)
- 10-23: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [13-26]
The addition of vertex ID and label fields and their use in constructing the
tableName
enhances the clarity of the table naming convention and encapsulation of vertex information.
- 39-41: The use of
ColumnType.apply(inVertexId)
andColumnType.apply(outVertexId)
assumes that theColumnType.apply
method can handle the type returned byinVertex.id()
andoutVertex.id()
. Ensure that this is the case, as vertex IDs in some graph databases can be of types other than integers.- 71-74: The construction of
recordValue
in thetoDml
method correctly includes the new vertex ID fields and the properties from the edge. This ensures that the records will match the new table structure.src/test/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdgeSpec.scala (3)
- 31-31: The test case has been updated to reflect the new table naming convention, which includes vertex label information. This change is consistent with the updates made to the
GraphEdge
class.- 56-58: The record keys in the test cases have been updated to match the new table names, ensuring that the tests will validate the correct behavior of the
toDml
method.- 80-85: The test case for ensuring no extra commas are written is a good practice to prevent syntax errors in the generated SQL. The updated table name in the test case reflects the new naming convention.
src/test/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala (4)
- 44-45: The properties within
ColumnList
have been reordered and modified to match the new table structure. This change is necessary to align the test cases with the updated codebase.- 55-55: The
RecordValue
instance has been updated with the new property names and values, ensuring that the test cases will validate the correct behavior of the code.- 52-64: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [61-71]
The addition of new table names in the
TableList
reflects the updated naming convention that includes vertex label information. This change ensures that the test cases will validate the correct behavior of the code.
- 85-106: The
RecordList
has been updated with new record keys and values to match the new table names and structure. This ensures that the test cases will validate the correct behavior of the code.README.md (1)
- 17-28: The documentation has been updated to reflect the new script functionality, which includes dynamic generation of SQL files with table and column names that incorporate vertex labels and property keys. This update provides clarity on the script's capabilities and usage.
src/test/scala/usecase/ByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala (3)
- 18-19: The addition of the import statement for
scala.collection.immutable.HashMap
is necessary for the changes made to theRecordList
data structures in the test cases.- 37-38: The
ColumnList
data structure has been reordered and modified to match the new table structure. This change is necessary to align the test cases with the updated codebase.- 32-101: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [55-189]
The
RecordList
data structure has been updated with new record keys and values to match the new table names and structure. The use ofHashMap
instead ofMap
is a semantic change that should not affect the functionality but should be verified to ensure it aligns with the intended usage in the codebase.Verification successful
The
HashMap
is imported fromscala.collection.immutable
, which suggests that it is being used for its immutable properties and performance characteristics. The usage within theByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala
file is consistent with typical usage patterns for immutable maps in Scala. There is no indication from the context provided that the functionality would be affected by the choice ofHashMap
over a genericMap
. Therefore, it can be concluded that the change toHashMap
should align with the intended usage in the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the use of HashMap instead of Map does not affect the functionality. # This is a placeholder for the actual verification logic, which would depend on the implementation details of the codebase.Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the import statement of HashMap to understand from which package it is being used. rg "import .*HashMap" # Search for the usage of HashMap in the codebase to understand the context. rg "HashMap" --context 5Length of output: 2753
#103
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
GraphEdge
class to better encapsulate vertex information and facilitate table name construction based on vertex labels.Tests
GraphEdgeSpec.scala
to include more descriptive table and record names for edge relationships.ByExhaustiveSearchSpec
andUsingSpecificKeyListSpec
test cases to reflect the new structure and naming for tables and records.Documentation