Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add: inVertex and outVertex label in edge table #104

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2024

Conversation

kazumatsudo
Copy link
Owner

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo commented Jan 21, 2024

#103

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated script to dynamically generate SQL files for graph database tables and data insertion, reflecting the structure of the graph.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved the GraphEdge class to better encapsulate vertex information and facilitate table name construction based on vertex labels.
  • Tests

    • Modified test cases in GraphEdgeSpec.scala to include more descriptive table and record names for edge relationships.
    • Updated ByExhaustiveSearchSpec and UsingSpecificKeyListSpec test cases to reflect the new structure and naming for tables and records.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to describe the dynamic generation of SQL files and the rationale behind the changes.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo self-assigned this Jan 21, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates revolve around enhancing a script to generate SQL from graph data structures. It now dynamically constructs SQL tables and insert statements, reflecting the graph's vertices and edges. The changes improve the script's adaptability to various graph configurations by incorporating vertex labels and IDs directly into the SQL schema and data manipulation processes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
README.md Updated script functionality for dynamic SQL file generation based on graph data.
src/main/scala/.../GraphEdge.scala
src/test/scala/.../GraphEdgeSpec.scala
Modified to handle dynamic vertex labels and IDs for table names and references.
src/test/scala/.../ByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala
src/test/scala/.../UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala
Updated imports, reordered and modified data structures, and renamed table names and record keys.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the data trees grow,
A script was woven with a new, dynamic flow.
Tables and records, now with labels so bright,
Reflecting the graph's dance from day into night.
🌟📊

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo changed the title Feature/divide edge table by vertex label add: inVertex and outVertex label in edge table Jan 21, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (af3d235) 71.83% compared to head (fe9b6ca) 72.00%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #104      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.83%   72.00%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines         348      350       +2     
  Branches       37       43       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          250      252       +2     
  Misses         98       98              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo merged commit 5bb50df into main Jan 21, 2024
1 check passed
@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo deleted the feature/divide_edge_table_by_vertex_label branch January 21, 2024 05:28
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between af3d235 and fe9b6ca.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdge.scala (3 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdgeSpec.scala (3 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/usecase/ByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala (5 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 14
src/main/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdge.scala (3)
  • 10-23: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [13-26]

The addition of vertex ID and label fields and their use in constructing the tableName enhances the clarity of the table naming convention and encapsulation of vertex information.

  • 39-41: The use of ColumnType.apply(inVertexId) and ColumnType.apply(outVertexId) assumes that the ColumnType.apply method can handle the type returned by inVertex.id() and outVertex.id(). Ensure that this is the case, as vertex IDs in some graph databases can be of types other than integers.
  • 71-74: The construction of recordValue in the toDml method correctly includes the new vertex ID fields and the properties from the edge. This ensures that the records will match the new table structure.
src/test/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdgeSpec.scala (3)
  • 31-31: The test case has been updated to reflect the new table naming convention, which includes vertex label information. This change is consistent with the updates made to the GraphEdge class.
  • 56-58: The record keys in the test cases have been updated to match the new table names, ensuring that the tests will validate the correct behavior of the toDml method.
  • 80-85: The test case for ensuring no extra commas are written is a good practice to prevent syntax errors in the generated SQL. The updated table name in the test case reflects the new naming convention.
src/test/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala (4)
  • 44-45: The properties within ColumnList have been reordered and modified to match the new table structure. This change is necessary to align the test cases with the updated codebase.
  • 55-55: The RecordValue instance has been updated with the new property names and values, ensuring that the test cases will validate the correct behavior of the code.
  • 52-64: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [61-71]

The addition of new table names in the TableList reflects the updated naming convention that includes vertex label information. This change ensures that the test cases will validate the correct behavior of the code.

  • 85-106: The RecordList has been updated with new record keys and values to match the new table names and structure. This ensures that the test cases will validate the correct behavior of the code.
README.md (1)
  • 17-28: The documentation has been updated to reflect the new script functionality, which includes dynamic generation of SQL files with table and column names that incorporate vertex labels and property keys. This update provides clarity on the script's capabilities and usage.
src/test/scala/usecase/ByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala (3)
  • 18-19: The addition of the import statement for scala.collection.immutable.HashMap is necessary for the changes made to the RecordList data structures in the test cases.
  • 37-38: The ColumnList data structure has been reordered and modified to match the new table structure. This change is necessary to align the test cases with the updated codebase.
  • 32-101: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [55-189]

The RecordList data structure has been updated with new record keys and values to match the new table names and structure. The use of HashMap instead of Map is a semantic change that should not affect the functionality but should be verified to ensure it aligns with the intended usage in the codebase.

Verification successful

The HashMap is imported from scala.collection.immutable, which suggests that it is being used for its immutable properties and performance characteristics. The usage within the ByExhaustiveSearchSpec.scala file is consistent with typical usage patterns for immutable maps in Scala. There is no indication from the context provided that the functionality would be affected by the choice of HashMap over a generic Map. Therefore, it can be concluded that the change to HashMap should align with the intended usage in the codebase.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the use of HashMap instead of Map does not affect the functionality.
# This is a placeholder for the actual verification logic, which would depend on the implementation details of the codebase.

Length of output: 0



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the import statement of HashMap to understand from which package it is being used.
rg "import .*HashMap"

# Search for the usage of HashMap in the codebase to understand the context.
rg "HashMap" --context 5

Length of output: 2753

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants