Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add: test for RelationIdentifier #119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2024

Conversation

kazumatsudo
Copy link
Owner

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo commented Jan 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Expanded testing for the ColumnType class to include a broader range of data types, ensuring more comprehensive coverage of its functionality.
    • Introduced new tests for the RecordValue class, focusing on the accurate conversion of different data types to their SQL representations.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo self-assigned this Jan 28, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing testing for both the ColumnType and RecordValue classes within a Scala project. These changes introduce comprehensive tests for a wide array of data types, ensuring that their behavior and SQL sentence conversion are thoroughly verified. This meticulous approach underscores a commitment to reliability and precision in handling diverse data types within the system.

Changes

File Location Change Summary
.../table/ddl/column/ColumnTypeSpec.scala Expanded tests for ColumnType.apply method, covering data types like Boolean, Byte, etc., to verify expected return types and column lengths.
.../table/dml/RecordValueSpec.scala Added type-specific tests for toSqlSentence method, focusing on data types like Boolean, Byte, etc., and ensuring accurate SQL representation conversion.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where tests abound,
A rabbit hopped, improvements found.
For each type, a test, a SQL phrase,
Ensuring correctness, through the maze.
🌟📚

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5c0b77c) 77.99% compared to head (3e64706) 78.86%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #119      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.99%   78.86%   +0.87%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines         459      459              
  Branches       43       43              
==========================================
+ Hits          358      362       +4     
+ Misses        101       97       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c0b77c and 3e64706.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnTypeSpec.scala (4 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValueSpec.scala (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValueSpec.scala (2)
  • 3-3: The import of RelationIdentifier is correctly added to support the new test case for RelationIdentifier data type conversion.
  • 11-52: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [14-89]

The added tests comprehensively cover the conversion of various data types to their SQL representations using the toSqlSentence method. Each test is well-structured, with clear comments explaining the purpose and expected outcome. This ensures the method behaves as expected across a wide range of data types, including complex types like util.UUID, java.time.Instant, and util.ArrayList, as well as the newly tested RelationIdentifier.

src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnTypeSpec.scala (3)
  • 3-3: The addition of the RelationIdentifier import is correctly implemented to support the new test case for RelationIdentifier in the ColumnType class tests.
  • 10-50: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [13-62]

The tests added for the ColumnType class's apply method effectively cover a wide range of data types, ensuring the method returns the correct ColumnType instances with appropriate column lengths. The inclusion of tests for complex types like util.UUID, java.time.Instant, and util.ArrayList, as well as the new RelationIdentifier, enhances the test suite's comprehensiveness.

  • 742-752: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [64-749]

The expansion of the merge method tests and the addition of tests for the toSqlSentence method are well-executed. These tests ensure that the ColumnType class correctly handles merging different column types and accurately represents various Scala types as SQL types, respectively. The thorough testing of edge cases, such as extremely long strings, contributes to the robustness of the test suite.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo merged commit 91261c5 into main Jan 28, 2024
1 check passed
@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo deleted the feature/test_for_relation_identifier branch January 28, 2024 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants