Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

traverse vertex and edge recursively in UsingSpecificKeyList #128

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2024

Conversation

kazumatsudo
Copy link
Owner

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo commented Feb 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced graph edge visibility by making the id field public.
    • Added new methods for improved vertex retrieval based on edge directionality.
    • Implemented more robust edge and vertex retrieval and traversal mechanisms.
  • Refactor
    • Updated methods to handle edge and vertex traversal recursively.
  • Tests
    • Expanded testing capabilities to include new retrieval methods and recursive traversal logic.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo self-assigned this Feb 4, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances a Scala project focused on graph database interactions, particularly adding and refining features for recursive data manipulation and vertex-edge relationships. Changes include improved visibility for graph edge identifiers, expanded query capabilities for vertex relationships, and the introduction of recursive traversal and storage mechanisms for vertices and edges, aiming to facilitate more complex data manipulations.

Changes

Files Change Summaries
build.sbt Added Wart.Recursion to wartremoverErrors.
.../graph/GraphEdge.scala Changed id field visibility from private to public.
.../infrastructure/VertexQuery.scala Added methods for vertex retrieval based on edge direction.
.../usecase/UsingSpecificKeyList.scala Expanded functionality for recursive edge and vertex retrieval and storage.
src/test/scala/.../MainSpec.scala Updated to use UsingSpecificKeyList for database testing.
src/test/scala/.../VertexQuerySpec.scala Added test methods for incoming and outgoing vertex lists.
src/test/scala/.../UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala Expanded data model for testing, including tables, columns, records, and relationships.

Related issues

Poem

🐇💻✨
In the realm of graphs and edges,
Through the code, the rabbit wedges.
Recursive calls, now unbound,
In vertices and edges, solutions found.
🌟📈🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (80a4a33) 78.86% compared to head (5b14f27) 79.18%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #128      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.86%   79.18%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines         459      466       +7     
  Branches       43       50       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits          362      369       +7     
  Misses         97       97              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80a4a33 and 5b14f27.
Files selected for processing (7)
  • build.sbt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdge.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/infrastructure/VertexQuery.scala (3 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyList.scala (3 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/MainSpec.scala (4 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/infrastructure/VertexQuerySpec.scala (3 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala (9 hunks)
Additional comments: 18
build.sbt (1)
  • 17-17: Change approved: Adding Wart.Recursion to wartremoverErrors aligns with the objective to enforce safe recursion practices.
src/main/scala/infrastructure/VertexQuery.scala (2)
  • 26-41: Method getInVertexList correctly retrieves incoming vertices for a given edge. Ensure that the edge ID is properly indexed in the graph database for performance.
  • 91-106: Method getOutVertexList correctly retrieves outgoing vertices for a given edge. Similar to getInVertexList, ensure that the edge ID is properly indexed for optimal performance.
src/test/scala/MainSpec.scala (3)
  • 6-6: Importing UsingSpecificKeyList is appropriate for testing the new functionality.
  • 86-92: Test setup for UsingSpecificKeyList with H2 database is correctly implemented.
  • 104-110: Test setup for UsingSpecificKeyList with MySQL database is correctly implemented.
src/main/scala/domain/graph/GraphEdge.scala (1)
  • 35-35: Change approved: Making the id field public in GraphEdge facilitates easier access during graph operations. Ensure that this change does not lead to unintended modifications or misuse of the edge identifiers.
src/test/scala/infrastructure/VertexQuerySpec.scala (3)
  • 3-3: Importing GraphEdge alongside GraphVertex is necessary for testing the new vertex query methods.
  • 21-37: Test for getInVertexList method is correctly implemented, ensuring that incoming vertices are properly retrieved.
  • 102-117: Test for getOutVertexList method is correctly implemented, ensuring that outgoing vertices are properly retrieved.
src/main/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyList.scala (5)
  • 49-52: Use of mutable sets for verticesSet and edgesSet is necessary for the recursive traversal functionality. Consider potential concurrency issues if accessed from multiple threads.
  • 54-69: Method getEdges correctly retrieves and filters edges for traversal. Ensure efficient indexing in the database to optimize performance.
  • 71-96: Method getVertices correctly retrieves and filters vertices for further traversal. Similar to getEdges, database indexing should be optimized.
  • 99-125: Recursive method getGraphByVertex is correctly implemented for traversing and storing vertices and edges. Ensure stack safety and consider limiting recursion depth to prevent stack overflow.
  • 137-149: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [127-146]

The overall execution flow in execute method, including recursive traversal and data storage, aligns with the PR objectives. Ensure comprehensive testing to cover various graph structures and sizes.

src/test/scala/usecase/UsingSpecificKeyListSpec.scala (3)
  • 25-26: Addition of HashMap import is appropriate for managing test data.
  • 48-62: Test data setup for tables and columns is correctly implemented, reflecting the expanded data model.
  • 76-127: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [79-253]

Test data setup for records and relationships is comprehensive, covering various scenarios and relationships within the graph.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo merged commit 6a04222 into main Feb 4, 2024
1 check passed
@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo deleted the feature/get_vertices_and_edges_recursively branch February 4, 2024 05:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants