Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add: test whether generated SQL is enabled to execute in H2 #88

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 20, 2024

Conversation

kazumatsudo
Copy link
Owner

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo commented Jan 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new execution method for enhanced data analysis and SQL generation.
    • Updated string representation in SQL sentences for better compatibility.
    • Added in-memory database configuration for improved testing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed SQL sentence generation by removing unnecessary length parameters for certain column types.
    • Adjusted SQL sentence construction for consistency and accuracy.
  • Tests

    • Implemented a comprehensive test suite to validate the new execution method using an H2 database.
    • Revised existing tests to align with the updated SQL sentence generation logic.
  • Refactor

    • Refactored the TableList and RecordList classes to utilize lazy evaluation in SQL sentence construction.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test documentation to reflect changes in assertions and expected outputs.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo self-assigned this Jan 20, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The project has been updated to enhance its database testing capabilities and improve SQL generation. New libraries for H2 database and Slick have been added for testing. The Main.scala file has been refactored to include a new execution method and use of GraphTraversalSource. SQL generation across domain classes now employs lazy evaluation, and string representations in SQL have been standardized to use single quotes. Tests have been updated to reflect these changes and validate functionality against an H2 in-memory database.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
build.sbt Added dependencies for H2 database and Slick.
src/main/scala/.../Main.scala Added GraphTraversalSource import, new execute method, and reorganized code for SQL execution.
src/main/scala/.../TableList.scala
src/main/scala/.../RecordList.scala
Changed toSqlSentence method return type from String to View[String] for lazy evaluation.
src/main/scala/.../ColumnType.scala
src/test/scala/.../ColumnTypeSpec.scala
Removed length parameter from SQL sentence generation for byte, short, and long types.
src/main/scala/.../RecordValue.scala Standardized string representation in SQL to use single quotes.
src/test/resources/application.conf Added H2 in-memory database configuration.
src/test/scala/.../MainSpec.scala Created tests for H2 database functionality and SQL execution.
src/test/scala/.../TableListSpec.scala
src/test/scala/.../RecordListSpec.scala
Updated assertions to check for a sequence of strings.
src/test/scala/.../ColumnListSpec.scala Updated test cases to reflect removal of length specification in SQL.
src/test/scala/.../RecordValueSpec.scala Modified SQL output to use single quotes and handle UUIDs/lists.

Poem

🐰✨
In the realm of code, where the data hops around,
New libraries sprout up from the fertile ground.
SQL strings now lazily unfurl in the night,
As the H2 database gleams, a beacon of light.
🌟📚

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 42 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (9b3398b) 68.78% compared to head (2583759) 69.25%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/main/scala/Main.scala 0.00% 42 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #88      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.78%   69.25%   +0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines         346      348       +2     
  Branches       39       40       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          238      241       +3     
+ Misses        108      107       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo merged commit 0126d05 into main Jan 20, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5125390 and 2583759.
Files selected for processing (13)
  • build.sbt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/Main.scala (3 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableList.scala (2 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnType.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordList.scala (2 hunks)
  • src/main/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValue.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/test/resources/application.conf (1 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/MainSpec.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableListSpec.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnListSpec.scala (2 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnTypeSpec.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordListSpec.scala (1 hunks)
  • src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValueSpec.scala (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 23
src/test/resources/application.conf (1)
  • 1-8: The configuration for the H2 in-memory database is correctly set up. The url, driver, connectionPool, and keepAliveConnection parameters are appropriately configured for H2 usage.
src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableList.scala (2)
  • 5-5: Import of scala.collection.View is correct for enabling lazy evaluation of collections.
  • 32-34: Changing the return type of toSqlSentence to View[String] is a significant change that affects how SQL sentences are constructed and returned. Ensure that all usages of this method are updated to handle a View instead of a String.
Verification successful

The verification process has provided evidence that the toSqlSentence method's change to return View[String] in the TableList class is handled correctly in the main application code and in the relevant test cases. The test cases have been updated to handle the new return type by converting it to a sequence before making comparisons. It is recommended that a manual review or a more thorough automated test suite be used to ensure complete correctness.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that all usages of toSqlSentence now handle View[String] correctly.
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'toSqlSentence($_)'

Length of output: 53



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of toSqlSentence to verify if they handle View[String] correctly.
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'toSqlSentence'

Length of output: 6757



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the specific usage of toSqlSentence in the TableList class within test cases.
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'TableList {
  $$$
  toSqlSentence
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 77



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of toSqlSentence in the specific test files mentioned in the previous output.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/test/scala/MainSpec.scala
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordKeySpec.scala
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValueSpec.scala
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordListSpec.scala
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableListSpec.scala

Length of output: 1561

src/main/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValue.scala (1)
  • 33-36: Replacing double quotes with single quotes in the string representation of certain column types is correct for SQL compatibility.
src/main/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordList.scala (2)
  • 3-3: Import of scala.collection.View is correct for enabling lazy evaluation of collections.
  • 37-40: Changing the return type of toSqlSentence to View[String] is a significant change that affects how SQL sentences are constructed and returned. Ensure that all usages of this method are updated to handle a View instead of a String.
Verification successful

The verification process has confirmed that the usages of toSqlSentence in the main application code have been updated to handle the new return type View[String] correctly. The method is used appropriately in Main.scala, TableList.scala, and RecordList.scala. Other instances in RecordKey.scala, ColumnList.scala, and ColumnType.scala return a String and thus do not require handling a View[String].

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that all usages of toSqlSentence now handle View[String] correctly.
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'toSqlSentence($_)'

Length of output: 53



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any usage of toSqlSentence, regardless of the context or arguments.
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'toSqlSentence'

Length of output: 6757



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the usage of toSqlSentence in Main.scala to ensure it handles View[String] correctly.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/main/scala/Main.scala

Length of output: 244


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the usage of toSqlSentence in TableList.scala to ensure it handles View[String] correctly.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableList.scala

Length of output: 240


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the usage of toSqlSentence in RecordList.scala to ensure it handles View[String] correctly.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/main/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordList.scala

Length of output: 273


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the usage of toSqlSentence in RecordKey.scala to ensure it handles View[String] correctly.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/main/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordKey.scala

Length of output: 121


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the usage of toSqlSentence in ColumnList.scala to ensure it handles View[String] correctly.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnList.scala

Length of output: 240


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the usage of toSqlSentence in ColumnType.scala to ensure it handles View[String] correctly.
rg "toSqlSentence" ./src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnType.scala

Length of output: 709

src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordValueSpec.scala (4)
  • 29-29: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the change in RecordValue.scala where double quotes are replaced with single quotes for string representations.
  • 32-32: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the change in RecordValue.scala where double quotes are replaced with single quotes for string representations.
  • 35-35: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the change in RecordValue.scala where double quotes are replaced with single quotes for string representations.
  • 38-38: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the change in RecordValue.scala where double quotes are replaced with single quotes for string representations.
build.sbt (1)
  • 54-56: The addition of the H2 database and Slick libraries as test dependencies is correct for enabling database testing.
src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnListSpec.scala (1)
  • 53-53: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the removal of length specifications for integer types in SQL sentence generation.
src/test/scala/MainSpec.scala (2)
  • 20-35: The test case is correctly set up to execute SQL statements against an H2 in-memory database, ensuring that the generated SQL is compatible with H2 syntax.
  • 37-42: The error handling for the case where usecase.execute returns None is appropriate, providing detailed information about the failure.
src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/TableListSpec.scala (1)
  • 57-60: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the change in TableList.scala where the return type of toSqlSentence was changed from String to View[String].
src/test/scala/domain/table/dml/RecordListSpec.scala (1)
  • 91-98: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the change in RecordList.scala where the return type of toSqlSentence was changed from String to View[String].
src/main/scala/Main.scala (1)
  • 24-103: The addition of the execute method in the Main object is a significant change. It encapsulates the process of selecting and executing analysis methods and generating SQL. Ensure that this method is correctly integrated into the application's workflow.
Verification successful

The output from the shell script indicates that the execute method is indeed being called within the Main.scala file at line 119. This confirms that the method has been integrated into the application's workflow.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the new execute method is correctly integrated and called within the application.
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'execute($_, $_)'

Length of output: 109

src/main/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnType.scala (3)
  • 19-19: The change to ColumnTypeByte to remove the length parameter from the SQL sentence generation is correct according to the PR objectives.
  • 24-24: The change to ColumnTypeShort to remove the length parameter from the SQL sentence generation is correct according to the PR objectives.
  • 28-28: The change to ColumnTypeInt to remove the length parameter from the SQL sentence generation is correct according to the PR objectives.
src/test/scala/domain/table/ddl/column/ColumnTypeSpec.scala (3)
  • 558-558: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the removal of the length specification for TINYINT.
  • 559-559: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the removal of the length specification for SMALLINT.
  • 560-560: The test case has been correctly updated to reflect the removal of the length specification for INT.

}

case class ColumnTypeLong(private val length: ColumnLength) extends ColumnType {
override def toSqlSentence: String = s"INT(${length.toSqlSentence})"
override def toSqlSentence: String = s"INT"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change to ColumnTypeLong to remove the length parameter from the SQL sentence generation is incorrect. The SQL type should be BIGINT instead of INT for long values.

- override def toSqlSentence: String = s"INT"
+ override def toSqlSentence: String = s"BIGINT"

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
override def toSqlSentence: String = s"INT"
override def toSqlSentence: String = s"BIGINT"

ColumnType.apply(1.toByte).toSqlSentence shouldBe "TINYINT"
ColumnType.apply(1.toShort).toSqlSentence shouldBe "SMALLINT"
ColumnType.apply(1).toSqlSentence shouldBe "INT"
ColumnType.apply(1.toLong).toSqlSentence shouldBe "INT"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test case incorrectly reflects the SQL type for long values as INT. It should be BIGINT.

- ColumnType.apply(1.toLong).toSqlSentence shouldBe "INT"
+ ColumnType.apply(1.toLong).toSqlSentence shouldBe "BIGINT"

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
ColumnType.apply(1.toLong).toSqlSentence shouldBe "INT"
ColumnType.apply(1.toLong).toSqlSentence shouldBe "BIGINT"

@kazumatsudo kazumatsudo deleted the feature/test_to_execute_sql_in_ci branch January 20, 2024 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants