Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-0.9] 馃悰 Fix permissionclaim patch thrashing #2175

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #2174

/assign ncdc

- Add map keys to APIBinding.Status.AppliedPermissionClaims and
  .ExportPermissionClaims
- Switched to using a sorted list when calculating applied permission
  claims so it doesn't keep generating new patches because of different
  ordering in the list.

Signed-off-by: Andy Goldstein <andy.goldstein@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Oct 11, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncdc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 11, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ea9ba5c into kcp-dev:release-0.9 Oct 11, 2022
@@ -312,6 +319,10 @@ spec:
- resource
type: object
type: array
x-kubernetes-list-map-keys:
- group
- resource
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is wrong. It cannot be a map. group-resource won't be unique.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

with the upcoming permission claim changes this indeed will not be unique any more. there will be multiple group/resource entries, one per resourceName/Selector and separate verb list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants