Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 migrate kcp clientset #2378

Merged

Conversation

stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov commented Nov 17, 2022

Depends on kcp-dev/kubernetes#111

Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.
Error: failed: Your PR description is really short.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 17, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Nov 17, 2022
This reverts commit d5d74cc, reversing
changes made to 93888e4.
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Why are these not strongly-typed? Can we refactor this in the future.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
The upstream cache.MetaNamespaceKeyFunc no longer silently considers
clusters, so we can just use that one.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
ClusterWorkspaceShard objects are only valid if they are in the root
cluster, so we are better off using a cluster-scoped client + informers
here.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Forgot to bump client-go as well ... re-tagging

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants