Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Role and ClusterRole merger should not modify cache objects #2604

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2023
Merged

🐛 Role and ClusterRole merger should not modify cache objects #2604

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2023

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Contributor

@vincepri vincepri commented Jan 11, 2023

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano vincepri@redhat.com

Summary

This PR also reverts 0831b69

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 11, 2023
@vincepri vincepri changed the title WIP 🐛 Role and ClusterRole merger should not modify cache objects 🐛 Role and ClusterRole merger should not modify cache objects Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 11, 2023
}

// The Role is a new one, deepcopy it in the current array.
current = append(current, cachedRole.DeepCopy())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use DeepCopyInto. It saves allocations.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't we keep track of deepcopied roles and only do it when the second instance is seen?

@sttts
Copy link
Member

sttts commented Jan 12, 2023

/lgtm
/approve

I think we can improve that even more. But this stops the bleeding.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 12, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@redhat.com>
@sttts
Copy link
Member

sttts commented Jan 12, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2fe22b6 into kcp-dev:main Jan 12, 2023
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
/*
Copyright 2021 The KCP Authors.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2023?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:) Copy paste

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants