Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix location cannot be found by placement during scheduling #2784

Merged

Conversation

qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Jian Qiu jqiu@redhat.com

Summary

It happens when setting the alternative workspace name on placement, which needs to be considered during scheduling

Related issue(s)

Fixes #2737

@qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold for a e2e test to verify

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 14, 2023
@davidfestal davidfestal added this to the v0.11 milestone Feb 14, 2023
Copy link
Member

@davidfestal davidfestal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we add either a unit test or an e2e test related to this fix and the previously-failing scenario ?

@qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor Author

Shouldn't we add either a unit test or an e2e test related to this fix and the previously-failing scenario ?

yeah, this is reason I am holding this PR

@qiujian16
Copy link
Contributor Author

e2e added
/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2023
@qiujian16 qiujian16 force-pushed the fix-location-placement branch 2 times, most recently from 32cd0a8 to b6461a7 Compare February 16, 2023 13:31
It happens when setting the alternative workspace name
on placement, which needs to be considered during scheduling

Signed-off-by: Jian Qiu <jqiu@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidfestal

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 20, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 109688a into kcp-dev:main Feb 20, 2023
@qiujian16 qiujian16 deleted the fix-location-placement branch February 20, 2023 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: kcp bind compute does not work as expected for locations on a different workspace
3 participants