Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore/bump pydantic and fastapi #1539

Conversation

IngerMathilde
Copy link

Description

Based on fdroesler pr (#1529), but with one important difference. Pydantic v2 is supported but not used by kedro viz. This simplifies the pr.

Development notes

This is just to show the idea behind it. Kind of unsure what is smart with adding tests with different environments etc.

QA notes

Checklist

  • Read the contributing guidelines
  • Opened this PR as a 'Draft Pull Request' if it is work-in-progress
  • Updated the documentation to reflect the code changes
  • Added new entries to the RELEASE.md file
  • Added tests to cover my changes

Signed-off-by: CORP\iboeijen <inger.van.boeijen@sogeti.com>
Signed-off-by: CORP\iboeijen <inger.van.boeijen@sogeti.com>
Signed-off-by: CORP\iboeijen <inger.van.boeijen@sogeti.com>
@IngerMathilde
Copy link
Author

Tried looking at this a bit more, but this approach is not working well with the newest fastapi. So then one could support the new pydantic but not the new fastapi. Atleast this is how it is currently. Will close it for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants