Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chain specific balance monitor #2344

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Feb 26, 2021
Merged

Conversation

lukasz-zimnoch
Copy link
Member

@lukasz-zimnoch lukasz-zimnoch commented Feb 24, 2021

Depends on: keep-network/keep-common#66

According to the changes made in keep-common, the balance monitor is no longer a chain-agnostic concept. Because of that, this change removes it from the chain.Handle interface. Instead of that, each chain implementation has a possibility to decide whether it provides a balance monitor or not. Apart from that, we also regenerate contract bindings in order to apply changes made in keep-common generators.

According to the changes made in `keep-common`,
balance monitor is no longer a chain-agnostic
concept. Because of that, this change removes
it from the `chain.Handle` interface. Instead
of that, each chain implementation has a
possibility to decide whether it provides
a balance monitor or not.
@lukasz-zimnoch lukasz-zimnoch marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2021 15:39
cmd/start.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/start.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/chain/ethereum/ethereum.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/start.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lukasz-zimnoch
Copy link
Member Author

@pdyraga all comments addressed!

@pdyraga pdyraga merged commit bb5839f into master Feb 26, 2021
@pdyraga pdyraga deleted the chain-specific-balance-monitor branch February 26, 2021 11:00
@pdyraga pdyraga added this to the v1.4.0 milestone Feb 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants