Formatting: prefer relative leveloffset in asciidoc

Refs #293.
keep-network · Sep 22, 2019 · a463a41 · a463a41
1 parent 612fd7d
commit a463a41
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/deposits/economics.adoc b/docs/deposits/economics.adoc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-== Deposit Economics
+= Deposit Economics
 
 :signer-fee-withheld: 0.005 TBTC
 

diff --git a/docs/deposits/index.adoc b/docs/deposits/index.adoc
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ SPV proofs when used as an additional validation step, as even entities with
 significant mining resources have a greatly reduced chance of creating fake
 proofs.
 
-include::./mispayment.adoc[leveloffset=0]
+include::./mispayment.adoc[leveloffset=+2]
 
 == Lots
 
@@ -165,4 +165,4 @@ requests and fund multiple deposits. This allows each deposit to be backed by
 a different signing group, both simplifying the bonding of signing groups and
 improving the resilience of the system to signing group failure.
 
-include::./economics.adoc[leveloffset=0]
+include::./economics.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
diff --git a/docs/deposits/mispayment.adoc b/docs/deposits/mispayment.adoc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-=== Mispayment
+= Mispayment
 
 The system is designed to function with a predefined lot size for all _Deposits_
 which is given as a system parameter. **Depositors should send the exact lot
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ primary  impact of overpayment and underpayment is on the `Deposit`'s collateral
 ratio. We treat overpayment and underpayment as faulty depositor behavior,
 and pass on the associated costs to the depositor.
 
-==== Underpayment
+== Underpayment
 
 Allowing underpayment on `Deposit` would result in over-bonded signers. To
 prevent this, the system will not accept funding proofs of less than the lot
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ locked in the funding transactions to the Signers. The Signers can unlock and
 evenly split the funds in the transaction after the _Deposit_ is resolved on-chain (see
 <<Multiple UTXOs>> for a full discussion).
 
-==== Overpayment
+== Overpayment
 
 Overpayment, in contrast, would result in under-bonded signers. When overfunding
 occurs, the system accepts the funding proof, but mints TBTC according to the
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ A depositor should notice this and immediately try to burn their TBTC to reclaim
 the amount. If not, the depositor effectively forfeits the overfunded value to
 other participants.
 
-==== Multiple UTXOs
+== Multiple UTXOs
 
 A faulty depositor may send multiple UTXOs to the signer group address. This
 may be the result of human or software error. Unfortunately, returning the