-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Veracity of current CPU time values #2
Comments
@davidlange6 @slava77 I was hoping either of you might be able to provide meaningful comments on the numbers provided about processing requirements. |
It's a question to Tom (I think he entered the numbers based on my inputs). |
ehm, where is the question?
tom
…On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Slava Krutelyov ***@***.***> wrote:
It's a question to Tom (I think he entered the numbers based on my inputs).
@tommasoboccali <https://github.com/tommasoboccali>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD52YRe6t7mrL8AMlL16bVo64cH9a7asks5r9wvsgaJpZM4NnxI8>
.
--
Tommaso Boccali
INFN Pisa
|
ok, now I see it - btw interesting, can we discuss at some point what is this python ;) We used these numbers from
AH, ok: here https://indico.cern.ch/event/624140/contributions/2533493/attachments/1438070/2212438/reco_2017_OnC_040317.pdf it says D is 16, so more than 10.
so in this last release (4 months after the estimates which entered the doc), reco is probably a bit too high, DR seems ~ ok tom |
Hey, it's becoming a party around here! What is this python? I keep telling people it's an expression of my midlife crisis (but I'm kidding). So the bit of code (currently in cpu.py, but we'll get it into a JSON file I'm sure) that currently is
should really be more like
My main concern is that I have got the current reconstruction and the HL-LHC expectations in the same units...there is that factor of 10 for Slava's computer that I keep worrying that I'm not counting or double counting or whatever. |
On 5/26/17 10:57 AM, Ken Bloom wrote:
Hey, it's becoming a party around here! What is this python? I keep
telling people it's an expression of my midlife crisis (but I'm kidding).
So the bit of code (currently in cpu.py, but we'll get it into a JSON
file I'm sure) that currently is
|data_reco_time_lhc = 250 #this is per HS mc_gensim_time_lhc = 500 #this
is per HS mc_digi_time_lhc = 100 #this is per HS |
should really be more like
|data_reco_time_lhc = 185 #this is per HS mc_gensim_time_lhc = 500 #this
is per HS mc_digi_time_lhc = 160 #this is per HS |
the numbers above are OK in HS06-s for Run2 and Run3 (phase-1)
…
My main concern is that I have got the current reconstruction and the
HL-LHC expectations in the same units...there is that factor of 10 for
Slava's computer that I keep worrying that I'm not counting or double
counting or whatever.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbnXIcnLkLXmIQBx6ey6hRTF2bvMPks5r9xKcgaJpZM4NnxI8>.
|
I got the numbers for the current-day GEN/SIM/DIGI/RECO out of the spreadsheet that was used for our most recent C-RSG request:
https://cms-docdb.cern.ch/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=13271
I used PU=35 and assumed that was a suitable luminosity scenario through both Run 2 and Run 3, given that the instantaneous luminosity isn't supposed to change much from here through Run 3. But I might have totally misinterpreted the numbers, so can someone please check? Maybe I will try assigning the issues to Chris and Liz. I've never assigned an issue before.
Also: there wasn't a separate value for DIGI in the spreadsheet. But since re-DR = 350 HS06 and RECO alone is listed as 250 HS06, I assumed DIGI = 100 HS06.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: