docs: document timeframe feature for KeptnMetric

[rakshitgondwal]

Fixes #1702

Updated https://main.lifecycle.keptn.sh/docs/yaml-crd-ref/metric/ to support the range.interval field.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for keptn-lifecycle-toolkit ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0615afa
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/keptn-lifecycle-toolkit/deploys/64ae76a33e596c0008747765
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1703--keptn-lifecycle-toolkit.netlify.app/docs/yaml-crd-ref/metric
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[RealAnna]

@rakshitgondwal thanks for adding docs! Could you also update the metrics examples availabels at metrics-operator/config/samples ?

https://github.com/rakshitgondwal/lifecycle-toolkit/blob/docs/1702/timeframe-for-keptnmetric/metrics-operator/config/samples

[rakshitgondwal]

Sure will do, should I also make the changes to examples/support in this PR only or should I raise another one for that? Those changes would be 2-3 liners only.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1703 (f3b9621) into main (342d9d1) will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1703      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.46%   63.55%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         143      143              
  Lines       10908    10908              
==========================================
+ Hits         6923     6933      +10     
+ Misses       3722     3715       -7     
+ Partials      263      260       -3     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Flag	Coverage Δ
certificate-operator	68.55% <ø> (ø)
component-tests	59.13% <ø> (+0.67%)	⬆️
lifecycle-operator	84.52% <ø> (ø)
metrics-operator	82.26% <ø> (ø)
scheduler	32.12% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[RealAnna]

Sure will do, should I also make the changes to examples/support in this PR only or should I raise another one for that? Those changes would be 2-3 liners only.

@rakshitgondwal I think you could squeeze that change here as well yes! Thankyou 🚀

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[odubajDT]

Nice work :)