bpf: Improve verifier for cond_op and spilled loop index variables #4894
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![kernel-patches-daemon-bpf[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/70728002?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Upstream branch: 34bf934 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
bpf-next_base
branch
from
0befe61
to
5c9b3aa
Compare
Currently, for BPF_JEQ/BPF_JNE insn, verifier determines whether the branch is taken or not only if both operands are constants. Therefore, for the following code snippet, 0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns#5 ; R0_w=scalar() 1: (a5) if r0 < 0x3 goto pc+2 ; R0_w=scalar(umin=3) 2: (b7) r2 = 2 ; R2_w=2 3: (1d) if r0 == r2 goto pc+2 6 At insn 3, since r0 is not a constant, verifier assumes both branch can be taken which may lead inproper verification failure. Add comparing umin/umax value and the constant. If the umin value is greater than the constant, or umax value is smaller than the constant, for JEQ the branch must be not-taken, and for JNE the branch must be taken. The jmp32 mode JEQ/JNE branch taken checking is also handled similarly. The following lists the veristat result w.r.t. changed number of processes insns during verification: File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------------- test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 64980 73472 +8492 (+13.07%) test_seg6_loop.bpf.linked3.o __add_egr_x 12425 12423 -2 (-0.02%) test_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked3.o estab 2634 2558 -76 (-2.89%) test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt.bpf.linked3.o xdp_ingress_v6 1421 1420 -1 (-0.07%) test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o xdp_ingress_v6 1238 1237 -1 (-0.08%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked3.o egress_fwdns_prio100 414 411 -3 (-0.72%) Mostly a small improvement but test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o has a 13% regression. I checked with verifier log and found it this is due to pruning. For some JEQ/JNE branches impacted by this patch, one branch is explored and the other has state equivalence and pruned. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
|
Upstream branch: a5f1da6 |
Add various tests for code pattern '<non-const> NE/EQ <const>' implemented in the previous verifier patch. Without the verifier patch, these new tests will fail. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
…erifier Currently, the verifier does not handle '<const> <cond_op> <non_const>' well. For example, ... 10: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) ; R1_w=scalar() R10=fp0 11: (b7) r2 = 0 ; R2_w=0 12: (2d) if r2 > r1 goto pc+2 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit 15: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+3 16: (0f) r0 += r1 ... At insn 12, verifier decides both true and false branch are possible, but actually only false branch is possible. Currently, the verifier already supports patterns '<non_const> <cond_op> <const>. Add support for patterns '<const> <cond_op> <non_const>' in a similar way. Also fix selftest 'verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign/bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 10' due to this change. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
… <non_const>' Add various tests for code pattern '<const> <cond_op> <non_const>' to exercise the previous verifier patch. The following are veristat changed number of processed insns stat comparing the previous patch vs. this patch: File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- ------------- test_seg6_loop.bpf.linked3.o __add_egr_x 12423 12314 -109 (-0.88%) Only one program is affected with minor change. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
bot
force-pushed
the
series/735220=>bpf-next
branch
from
8837758
to
be7772e
Compare
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
bot
force-pushed
the
bpf-next_base
branch
from
5c9b3aa
to
61bab70
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=737708 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Improve verifier for cond_op and spilled loop index variables
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=737708