Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Allow reassigning keyboard shortcut #85

Closed
jxn opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Allow reassigning keyboard shortcut #85

jxn opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@jxn
Copy link

jxn commented Nov 8, 2017

I've noticed that Conex replaces the Ctrl + Shift + m keyboard shortcut that ships with firefox for responsive design view. I use this a lot as a developer, and I end up disabling conex. I'd like to remap to Ctrl + Shift + e like the old tab groups extension. Any possibility of allowing this to be configured in preferences?

@kesselborn
Copy link
Owner

no .... there is no way to make it configurable at the moment :( . I moved it to that combination as there is no good overview of used combination. I am happy to move it to another combination -- it was ctrl + shift + y before but that was used as well.
Keyboard shortcut support is kind of a mess.

@kesselborn
Copy link
Owner

it's been changed in 0.0.74

@grahamperrin
Copy link
Contributor

… I use … a lot as a developer, …

Keyboard shortcuts - Firefox Developer Tools | MDN

… remap to Ctrl + Shift + e …

Not listed at Mozilla's page, with Firefox Developer Edition 58.0b1 (64-bit) on release build 16G1036 of Mac OS X 10.12.6 (macOS Sierra) we have OptionCommandE for Network.

Similarly, ControlShiftE is the Web Developer shortcut for Network in Firefox 56.0.2:

2017-11-09 04 42 29 mozilla firefox start page - mozilla firefox

Copied from the window of Dorando keyconfig in 56.0.2 after I disabled the shortcut:

name: Network [Web Developer], id: key_netmonitor, shortcut: <Disabled>, code:
;

What's above is for reference only. I'll add more under open issue #69

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants