Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about correlated agreement statistics when the subjects are different in the two periods #1

Open
bzki opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@bzki
Copy link

bzki commented Feb 27, 2023

Thanks for your work on this package and the methodology. My understanding is that these functions work when you have the same raters in 2 periods and the same subjects being rated in both periods (as the name of the package implies, analogous to a paired t-test). Are you aware of methods or software implementations that can handle the following extension:

  • Different subjects being rated in the two periods.
  • Not every subject being rated by every rater. For example, raters 1, 2 and 3 rating subject A and B, raters 4, 5 and 6 rating subject C and D, and so forth.
  • 2 groups of raters of different sizes, with overlap in the 2 periods (e.g., maybe due to attrition, we have 10 raters in the first period and 8 in the second, and the 8 are in common to the two periods). This aspect is less important than the above two points.

One can estimate agreement statistics in 1 period using Edwards/Nelson GLMM-model based agreement stats or Gwet's AC1/AC2 (e.g., using your package irrCAC or the SAS macro MAGREE). But I'm not sure there is a way to estimate correlation of the agreement statistics in 2 periods in order to estimate a standard error and confidence interval for the difference. Do you have any suggestions or ideas for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant