You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Specifically regarding the FFF (FDM) comparison, if the goal is to get an apples-to-apples comparison between printers, then we should also specify the nozzle diameter and layer height to be used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See my comment on Issue #10 for a bit of background, but the goal here is to just get a comparison of the complete system (hardware + software + electronics) while holding material constant. By changing which variables you are holding constant and which you are observing, you can learn a lot with these types of geometries, but again, the scope here is at the "product level" rather than the subsystem level of extruders, stepper drivers, and other process parameters.
Specifically regarding the FFF (FDM) comparison, if the goal is to get an apples-to-apples comparison between printers, then we should also specify the nozzle diameter and layer height to be used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: