New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DO NOT MERGE YET] JBPM-6627 - Extend tests for Kie Server Controller Integration tests #1363
Conversation
769d9ee
to
285c659
Compare
Jenkins retest this |
@jakubschwan overall looks good to me. I was only wondering if you could get a green build by disabling those tests that are known to not be supported in the REST API yet. That way we could enable it as we include the new endpoints. |
Sure, in REST API are now not supported REST endpoints for Rule capability and Runtime monitoring, right? But there still be some tests failures because of web socket test (e.g. not thrown exception on wrong method entrance - not existing container) |
Test failures:
@cristianonicolai Can you check tests results too? If you think that some scenario is not right please let me know, otherwise I'll start to creating issues. |
assertThat(serverInstances.getServerInstanceKeys()).hasSize(1); | ||
ServerInstanceKey serverInstance = serverInstances.getServerInstanceKeys()[0]; | ||
SoftAssertions.assertSoftly(softly -> { | ||
softly.assertThat(serverInstance.getServerName()).isEqualTo(kieServerInfo.getName()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cristianonicolai What is expected name of the server instance? I think it should be same as name of the Kie Server or at least server instance should contain it. But in this test failed with message: expected:<"[KieServer@/kie-server-services]"> but was:<"[a0e625bf-251d-3c1f-ad11-0a17f1c14e21@localhost:37668]">
any plans to get this merged? if not please close |
I think it can be closed. Tests were include in PRs with fix, right @cristianonicolai ? |
@jakubschwan correct, thanks a lot for this reproducers. |
Tests for JBPM-6243
@cristianonicolai Can you take a look?