Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[KIECLOUD-221] upgrade datagrid and amq broker versions #172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2019
Merged

[KIECLOUD-221] upgrade datagrid and amq broker versions #172

merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2019

Conversation

errantepiphany
Copy link
Member

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KIECLOUD-221
[KIECLOUD-221] upgrade datagrid and amq broker versions

Signed-off-by: David Ward dward@redhat.com

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @errantepiphany. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kiegroup or openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@errantepiphany
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @tchughesiv

@errantepiphany
Copy link
Member Author

@tchughesiv Please wait to merge until @spolti and @jakubschwan has had a chance to also look at jboss-container-images/rhdm-7-openshift-image#248 and jboss-container-images/rhpam-7-openshift-image#303 . Thanks!

config/envs/rhpam-authoring-ha.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
## KIE Servers END
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here, with newline at end of file, if it's removed

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bmozaffa I've tried everything, and no matter what editor I use (vim, gedit, or even online with the github editor), I can't get a newline to persist at the end of this file. Why is it necessary to be there? And if so, what can I do to add it back?

Copy link
Collaborator

@bmozaffa bmozaffa May 21, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weird, I just submitted a PR against your branch. If you merge it, you can then go back and squash it in and do a push -f?

Without a newline, in some envs you also get a warning when doing a git diff, even when the content is the same near the EOF

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on IntelliJ I had to put 2 blank lines to count one.

Signed-off-by: David Ward <dward@redhat.com>
@tchughesiv
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@bmozaffa
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bmozaffa, errantepiphany

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit dd279a1 into kiegroup:master May 22, 2019
@errantepiphany errantepiphany deleted the KIECLOUD-221_master branch May 23, 2019 01:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants