This repository has been archived by the owner on May 14, 2021. It is now read-only.
add x509 to proguard ignore rules #23
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
we're not using x509 in eddsa library so it's safe to ignore (use of x509 is new to the latest version of eddsa lib) sun.security packages are internal to the jvm and are discourge from using, that's why proguard is not recognize.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
we're not using x509 in eddsa library so it's safe to ignore (use of x509
is new to the latest version of eddsa lib) sun.security packages are internal
to the jvm and are discourge from using, that's why proguard is not recognize.