fix: print span info with ctx && add CtxKVLog method

[weedge]

go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel@v1.11.1

CHANGE:

1. add zap logger for zap fields, log kv pairs

func (l *Logger) CtxKVLog(ctx context.Context, level klog.Level, format string, kvs ...interface{})

2. fix: print span info with ctx

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[li-jin-gou]

need to sign cla

[weedge]

need to sign cla
it's ok , signed the CLA

[CoderPoet]

Please fix the problem with code formatting

[weedge]

Please fix the problem with code formatting

golangci-lint run --out-format=github-actions --path-prefix=./logging/zap -E gofumpt, it's ok

[rogerogers]

Seems not necessary to introduce logger, zap.Any is even slower than sugar.

[weedge]

Seems not necessary to introduce logger, zap.Any is even slower than sugar.

I see https://github.com/uber-go/zap#performance performance is good to me;
Please show some benchmark ? i see zap.Any code switch case , if defined type , no reflection, like %v or %+v;

[rogerogers]

Seems not necessary to introduce logger, zap.Any is even slower than sugar.

I see https://github.com/uber-go/zap#performance performance is good to me; Please show some benchmark ? i see zap.Any code switch case , if defined type , no reflection, like %v or %+v;

func BenchmarkZapAny(b *testing.B) {
	l, _ := zap.NewProduction()
	for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
		l.Info("bench", zap.String("key", "value"), zap.Any("key1", "value1"))
	}
}

func BenchmarkZapSugar(b *testing.B) {
	l, _ := zap.NewProduction()
	s := l.Sugar()
	for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
		s.Infow("bench", "key", "value", zap.Any("key1", "value1"))
	}
}

https://pkg.go.dev/go.uber.org/zap#hdr-Choosing_a_Logger

sugar has similar methods.

[weedge]

Seems not necessary to introduce logger, zap.Any is even slower than sugar.

I see https://github.com/uber-go/zap#performance performance is good to me; Please show some benchmark ? i see zap.Any code switch case , if defined type , no reflection, like %v or %+v;

func BenchmarkZapAny(b *testing.B) {
	l, _ := zap.NewProduction()
	for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
		l.Info("bench", zap.String("key", "value"), zap.Any("key1", "value1"))
	}
}

func BenchmarkZapSugar(b *testing.B) {
	l, _ := zap.NewProduction()
	s := l.Sugar()
	for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
		s.Infow("bench", "key", "value", zap.Any("key1", "value1"))
	}
}

https://pkg.go.dev/go.uber.org/zap#hdr-Choosing_a_Logger

sugar has similar methods.

3q~, sugar **w method print kv log is ok~

[ppzqh]

@CoderPoet Seems that all issues are fixed. Please help to take a look at this pr, thanks!

[CoderPoet]

/LGTM

[bytedance-oss-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CoderPoet, weedge

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [CoderPoet]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment