-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Text classification task accuracy problem #14
Comments
Thank you for your question, |
|
@kk7nc Thank you kk |
I am very sorry that I did not output plot for the result of the run this time.
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.78780, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.78780 to 0.80744, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.80744 to 0.81746, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc did not improve from 0.81746
Epoch 00005: val_acc did not improve from 0.81746
Epoch 00006: val_acc did not improve from 0.81746
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.81746 to 0.81871, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc did not improve from 0.81871
Epoch 00098: val_acc did not improve from 0.81871
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.81871
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.81871
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.15414, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.15414 to 0.34545, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.34545 to 0.50167, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.50167 to 0.61696, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.61696 to 0.62322, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.62322 to 0.67627, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.67627 to 0.69507, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc improved from 0.69507 to 0.71136, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00009: val_acc did not improve from 0.71136
Epoch 00010: val_acc improved from 0.71136 to 0.71972, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00011: val_acc did not improve from 0.71972
Epoch 00012: val_acc improved from 0.71972 to 0.72974, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00013: val_acc improved from 0.72974 to 0.73183, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00014: val_acc did not improve from 0.73183
Epoch 00015: val_acc did not improve from 0.73183
Epoch 00016: val_acc did not improve from 0.73183
Epoch 00017: val_acc improved from 0.73183 to 0.73935, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00018: val_acc improved from 0.73935 to 0.74060, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00019: val_acc did not improve from 0.74060
Epoch 00020: val_acc improved from 0.74060 to 0.74185, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00021: val_acc did not improve from 0.74185
Epoch 00022: val_acc did not improve from 0.74185
Epoch 00023: val_acc did not improve from 0.74185
Epoch 00024: val_acc did not improve from 0.74185
Epoch 00025: val_acc did not improve from 0.74185
Epoch 00026: val_acc did not improve from 0.74185
Epoch 00027: val_acc improved from 0.74185 to 0.74353, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00028: val_acc did not improve from 0.74353
Epoch 00029: val_acc did not improve from 0.74353
Epoch 00030: val_acc did not improve from 0.74353
Epoch 00031: val_acc improved from 0.74353 to 0.74436, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_1.hdf5
... Epoch 00098: val_acc did not improve from 0.74436
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.74436
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.74436
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.07937, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.07937 to 0.16124, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.16124 to 0.22640, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.22640 to 0.27151, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.27151 to 0.27903, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.27903 to 0.34252, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.34252 to 0.37427, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc improved from 0.37427 to 0.42147, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00009: val_acc improved from 0.42147 to 0.43901, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00010: val_acc improved from 0.43901 to 0.46157, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00011: val_acc did not improve from 0.46157
Epoch 00012: val_acc improved from 0.46157 to 0.47995, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00013: val_acc improved from 0.47995 to 0.50627, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00014: val_acc improved from 0.50627 to 0.52089, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00015: val_acc improved from 0.52089 to 0.54386, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00016: val_acc did not improve from 0.54386
Epoch 00017: val_acc improved from 0.54386 to 0.55138, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00018: val_acc improved from 0.55138 to 0.55597, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00019: val_acc improved from 0.55597 to 0.56683, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00020: val_acc did not improve from 0.56683
Epoch 00021: val_acc improved from 0.56683 to 0.57143, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00022: val_acc improved from 0.57143 to 0.57519, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00023: val_acc did not improve from 0.57519
Epoch 00024: val_acc improved from 0.57519 to 0.58396, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00025: val_acc improved from 0.58396 to 0.59649, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00026: val_acc improved from 0.59649 to 0.60359, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00027: val_acc improved from 0.60359 to 0.60485, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00028: val_acc did not improve from 0.60485
Epoch 00029: val_acc did not improve from 0.60485
Epoch 00030: val_acc improved from 0.60485 to 0.60819, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00031: val_acc improved from 0.60819 to 0.61320, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00032: val_acc did not improve from 0.61320
Epoch 00033: val_acc improved from 0.61320 to 0.62406, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00034: val_acc improved from 0.62406 to 0.62657, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00035: val_acc did not improve from 0.62657
Epoch 00036: val_acc did not improve from 0.62657
Epoch 00037: val_acc did not improve from 0.62657
Epoch 00038: val_acc improved from 0.62657 to 0.63116, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00039: val_acc did not improve from 0.63116
Epoch 00040: val_acc did not improve from 0.63116
Epoch 00041: val_acc did not improve from 0.63116
Epoch 00042: val_acc improved from 0.63116 to 0.63576, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00043: val_acc did not improve from 0.63576
Epoch 00044: val_acc improved from 0.63576 to 0.64119, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00045: val_acc improved from 0.64119 to 0.65038, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00046: val_acc improved from 0.65038 to 0.65121, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00047: val_acc did not improve from 0.65121
Epoch 00048: val_acc did not improve from 0.65121
Epoch 00049: val_acc improved from 0.65121 to 0.65664, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00050: val_acc did not improve from 0.65664
Epoch 00051: val_acc did not improve from 0.65664
Epoch 00052: val_acc did not improve from 0.65664
Epoch 00053: val_acc did not improve from 0.65664
Epoch 00054: val_acc did not improve from 0.65664
Epoch 00055: val_acc improved from 0.65664 to 0.66625, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00056: val_acc did not improve from 0.66625
Epoch 00057: val_acc did not improve from 0.66625
Epoch 00058: val_acc did not improve from 0.66625
Epoch 00059: val_acc improved from 0.66625 to 0.66667, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00060: val_acc improved from 0.66667 to 0.67168, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00061: val_acc did not improve from 0.67168
Epoch 00062: val_acc did not improve from 0.67168
Epoch 00063: val_acc improved from 0.67168 to 0.67293, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00064: val_acc improved from 0.67293 to 0.67502, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00065: val_acc improved from 0.67502 to 0.67836, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00066: val_acc did not improve from 0.67836
Epoch 00067: val_acc did not improve from 0.67836
Epoch 00068: val_acc did not improve from 0.67836
Epoch 00069: val_acc did not improve from 0.67836
Epoch 00070: val_acc improved from 0.67836 to 0.68087, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00071: val_acc did not improve from 0.68087
Epoch 00072: val_acc improved from 0.68087 to 0.68254, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00073: val_acc improved from 0.68254 to 0.68463, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00074: val_acc did not improve from 0.68463
Epoch 00075: val_acc improved from 0.68463 to 0.68672, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00076: val_acc did not improve from 0.68672
Epoch 00077: val_acc did not improve from 0.68672
Epoch 00078: val_acc did not improve from 0.68672
Epoch 00079: val_acc improved from 0.68672 to 0.68755, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00080: val_acc improved from 0.68755 to 0.69048, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00081: val_acc did not improve from 0.69048
Epoch 00082: val_acc improved from 0.69048 to 0.69215, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00083: val_acc did not improve from 0.69215
Epoch 00084: val_acc did not improve from 0.69215
Epoch 00085: val_acc did not improve from 0.69215
Epoch 00086: val_acc improved from 0.69215 to 0.69674, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00087: val_acc did not improve from 0.69674
Epoch 00088: val_acc did not improve from 0.69674
Epoch 00089: val_acc did not improve from 0.69674
Epoch 00090: val_acc did not improve from 0.69674
Epoch 00091: val_acc improved from 0.69674 to 0.69758, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00092: val_acc improved from 0.69758 to 0.69799, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00093: val_acc did not improve from 0.69799
Epoch 00094: val_acc did not improve from 0.69799
Epoch 00095: val_acc did not improve from 0.69799
Epoch 00096: val_acc did not improve from 0.69799
Epoch 00097: val_acc did not improve from 0.69799
Epoch 00098: val_acc improved from 0.69799 to 0.69967, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.69967
Epoch 00100: val_acc improved from 0.69967 to 0.70593, saving model to weights\weights_DNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.12657, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.12657 to 0.17251, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc did not improve from 0.17251
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.17251 to 0.21178, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.21178 to 0.27068, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.27068 to 0.33292, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.33292 to 0.36424, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc improved from 0.36424 to 0.44069, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00009: val_acc improved from 0.44069 to 0.51378, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00010: val_acc improved from 0.51378 to 0.52632, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00011: val_acc improved from 0.52632 to 0.56600, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00012: val_acc did not improve from 0.56600
Epoch 00013: val_acc improved from 0.56600 to 0.60777, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00014: val_acc improved from 0.60777 to 0.62448, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00015: val_acc did not improve from 0.62448
Epoch 00016: val_acc improved from 0.62448 to 0.65873, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00017: val_acc improved from 0.65873 to 0.66667, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00018: val_acc did not improve from 0.66667
Epoch 00019: val_acc improved from 0.66667 to 0.67126, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00020: val_acc improved from 0.67126 to 0.67419, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00021: val_acc did not improve from 0.67419
Epoch 00022: val_acc did not improve from 0.67419
Epoch 00023: val_acc improved from 0.67419 to 0.67460, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00024: val_acc improved from 0.67460 to 0.68881, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00025: val_acc did not improve from 0.68881
Epoch 00026: val_acc did not improve from 0.68881
Epoch 00027: val_acc did not improve from 0.68881
Epoch 00028: val_acc improved from 0.68881 to 0.69674, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00029: val_acc did not improve from 0.69674
Epoch 00030: val_acc improved from 0.69674 to 0.69841, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00031: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00032: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00033: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00034: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00035: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00036: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00037: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00038: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00039: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00040: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00041: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00042: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00043: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00044: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00045: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00046: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00047: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00048: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00049: val_acc did not improve from 0.69841
Epoch 00050: val_acc improved from 0.69841 to 0.70092, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00051: val_acc did not improve from 0.70092
Epoch 00052: val_acc did not improve from 0.70092
Epoch 00053: val_acc did not improve from 0.70092
Epoch 00054: val_acc improved from 0.70092 to 0.70551, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00055: val_acc did not improve from 0.70551
Epoch 00056: val_acc improved from 0.70551 to 0.70677, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00057: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00058: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00059: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00060: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00061: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00062: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00063: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00064: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00065: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00066: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00067: val_acc did not improve from 0.70677
Epoch 00068: val_acc improved from 0.70677 to 0.71596, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00069: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00070: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00071: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00072: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00073: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00074: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00075: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00076: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00077: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00078: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00079: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00080: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00081: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00082: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00083: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00084: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00085: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00086: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00087: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00088: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00089: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00090: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00091: val_acc did not improve from 0.71596
Epoch 00092: val_acc improved from 0.71596 to 0.71637, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00093: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00094: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00095: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00096: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00097: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00098: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.71637
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.15581, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.15581 to 0.24854, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.24854 to 0.37761, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.37761 to 0.48329, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.48329 to 0.61404, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.61404 to 0.70468, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.70468 to 0.76232, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc improved from 0.76232 to 0.77444, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00009: val_acc improved from 0.77444 to 0.79156, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00010: val_acc improved from 0.79156 to 0.80493, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00011: val_acc did not improve from 0.80493
Epoch 00012: val_acc improved from 0.80493 to 0.80827, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00013: val_acc did not improve from 0.80827
Epoch 00014: val_acc improved from 0.80827 to 0.81788, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00015: val_acc improved from 0.81788 to 0.82080, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_1.hdf5
... Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.82247
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.82247
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.14327, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.14327 to 0.34169, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.34169 to 0.56224, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.56224 to 0.70259, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.70259 to 0.73517, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.73517 to 0.77068, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.77068 to 0.77360, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc did not improve from 0.77360
Epoch 00009: val_acc improved from 0.77360 to 0.77778, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00010: val_acc improved from 0.77778 to 0.77778, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00011: val_acc did not improve from 0.77778
Epoch 00012: val_acc did not improve from 0.77778
Epoch 00013: val_acc did not improve from 0.77778
Epoch 00014: val_acc did not improve from 0.77778
Epoch 00015: val_acc improved from 0.77778 to 0.77820, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00016: val_acc did not improve from 0.77820
Epoch 00017: val_acc did not improve from 0.77820
Epoch 00018: val_acc did not improve from 0.77820
Epoch 00019: val_acc did not improve from 0.77820
Epoch 00020: val_acc improved from 0.77820 to 0.78321, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00021: val_acc did not improve from 0.78321
Epoch 00022: val_acc did not improve from 0.78321
Epoch 00023: val_acc improved from 0.78321 to 0.78947, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00024: val_acc did not improve from 0.78947
Epoch 00025: val_acc did not improve from 0.78947
Epoch 00026: val_acc did not improve from 0.78947
Epoch 00027: val_acc did not improve from 0.78947
Epoch 00028: val_acc improved from 0.78947 to 0.79198, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00029: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00030: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00031: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00032: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00033: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00034: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00035: val_acc did not improve from 0.79198
Epoch 00036: val_acc improved from 0.79198 to 0.80284, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00037: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00038: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00039: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00040: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00041: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00042: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00043: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00044: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00045: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00046: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00047: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00048: val_acc did not improve from 0.80284
Epoch 00049: val_acc improved from 0.80284 to 0.80660, saving model to weights\weights_RNN_2.hdf5
... Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.80911
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.80911
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.03592, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.03592 to 0.11571, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.11571 to 0.15957, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.15957 to 0.22222, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.22222 to 0.27945, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.27945 to 0.36550, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.36550 to 0.52297, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc did not improve from 0.52297
Epoch 00009: val_acc improved from 0.52297 to 0.62406, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00010: val_acc improved from 0.62406 to 0.65915, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00011: val_acc improved from 0.65915 to 0.68588, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00012: val_acc improved from 0.68588 to 0.71053, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00013: val_acc improved from 0.71053 to 0.73350, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00014: val_acc improved from 0.73350 to 0.74353, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00015: val_acc did not improve from 0.74353
Epoch 00016: val_acc improved from 0.74353 to 0.75856, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00017: val_acc did not improve from 0.75856
Epoch 00018: val_acc did not improve from 0.75856
Epoch 00019: val_acc did not improve from 0.75856
Epoch 00020: val_acc improved from 0.75856 to 0.76358, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00021: val_acc did not improve from 0.76358
Epoch 00022: val_acc improved from 0.76358 to 0.77652, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00023: val_acc improved from 0.77652 to 0.77945, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00024: val_acc did not improve from 0.77945
Epoch 00025: val_acc did not improve from 0.77945
Epoch 00026: val_acc did not improve from 0.77945
Epoch 00027: val_acc did not improve from 0.77945
Epoch 00028: val_acc improved from 0.77945 to 0.78739, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00029: val_acc did not improve from 0.78739
Epoch 00030: val_acc improved from 0.78739 to 0.79490, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00031: val_acc did not improve from 0.79490
Epoch 00032: val_acc did not improve from 0.79490
Epoch 00033: val_acc did not improve from 0.79490
Epoch 00034: val_acc improved from 0.79490 to 0.79908, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00035: val_acc did not improve from 0.79908
Epoch 00036: val_acc did not improve from 0.79908
Epoch 00037: val_acc improved from 0.79908 to 0.81078, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00038: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00039: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00040: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00041: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00042: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00043: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00044: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00045: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00046: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00047: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00048: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00049: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00050: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00051: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00052: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00053: val_acc improved from 0.81078 to 0.81328, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
Epoch 00054: val_acc did not improve from 0.81328
Epoch 00055: val_acc improved from 0.81328 to 0.82038, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_0.hdf5
...
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.83835
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.83835
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.06892, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc improved from 0.06892 to 0.23434, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00003: val_acc improved from 0.23434 to 0.40894, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00004: val_acc improved from 0.40894 to 0.51880, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00005: val_acc improved from 0.51880 to 0.71261, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00006: val_acc improved from 0.71261 to 0.76190, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00007: val_acc improved from 0.76190 to 0.78947, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00008: val_acc improved from 0.78947 to 0.79407, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00009: val_acc improved from 0.79407 to 0.81078, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00010: val_acc did not improve from 0.81078
Epoch 00011: val_acc improved from 0.81078 to 0.81161, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00012: val_acc improved from 0.81161 to 0.81997, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00013: val_acc did not improve from 0.81997
Epoch 00014: val_acc improved from 0.81997 to 0.82373, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00015: val_acc improved from 0.82373 to 0.83292, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
Epoch 00016: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00017: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00018: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00019: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00020: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00021: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00022: val_acc did not improve from 0.83292
Epoch 00023: val_acc improved from 0.83292 to 0.83835, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_1.hdf5
...
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.84879
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.84879
Epoch 00001: val_acc improved from -inf to 0.02966, saving model to weights\weights_CNN_2.hdf5
Epoch 00002: val_acc did not improve from 0.02966 Epoch 99/100
Epoch 00099: val_acc did not improve from 0.02966
Epoch 00100: val_acc did not improve from 0.02966 (2394, 9) Process finished with exit code 0 I need to ask you two questions about the above results: |
Thank you for sending me the results, For this dataset, I think 100-150 epochs are enough for most of the RDLs |
Ok, thank you~ |
Hello, I am very interested in your article--An Improvement of Data Classification Using Random Multimodel Deep Learning (RMDL)
However, during the experiment, I found that the reproducibility accuracy of the four data sets WOS11967, WOS46985, IMDB and 20NewsGroup differed greatly. Is there any other information that needs attention besides the information published by github?
Looking forward to your guidance, thank you~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: